X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-155-22565

Well Details

Well ID: 34-155-22565
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Trumbull
Municipality: Weathersfield Township
Operator Name: ENERVEST OPERATING LLC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: OHIO EDISON
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1984-06-25
Spud Date: 1984-06-27
Spud Drilling Contractor: ARMSTRONG DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1984-07-04
Well Total Depth: 4946.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 41.150000
Longitude: -80.760000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1984-06-25 1702 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC GeoDate 6/25/84
Oil and Gas 1984-06-25 Issued Date 6/25/84 Expired Date 12/22/84 Acres 0200000 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation CLINTON Proposed Depth 04946 Proposed Drill Depth 04946
Original Spud 1984-06-27
Completed 1984-07-04
Reached Total Depth 1984-07-04
Completion Report Received 1984-08-03
Construction Permit Expires 1984-12-22
Change of Owner 1999-10-14 Operator changed from 1702, LOMA ENTERPRISES INC to 1388, NORTH COAST ENERGY INC
Change of Owner 2010-05-06 Operator changed from 1388, EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC to 7578, ENERVEST OPERATING LLC
Record Last Modified 2015-09-24

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 0 0
0 0
2006-09-11 4730 4786 22
4730 4786 22
0 0

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 92200 60000
ACID 0 500 Gal 0 FRAC:H2O,SAND,N2
N2 0 225 Mscf 0

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 36580.00 299.00 365
1986 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 31216.00 151.00 365
1987 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 23174.00 219.00 365
1988 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 19811.00 68.00 365
1989 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 16838.00 66.00 365
1990 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 16122.00 68.00 365
1991 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 13517.00 75.00 365
1992 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 9968.00 0.00 365
1993 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 7946.00 56.00 365
1994 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 5239.00 0.00 365
1995 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 6317.00 0.00 365
1996 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 5722.00 61.00 365
1997 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 6017.00 0.00 365
1998 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC 5296.00 0.00 365
1999 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 1283.00 0.00 91
2000 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2023.00 0.00 365
2001 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2630.00 0.00 365
2002 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 3425.00 0.00 365
2003 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2846.00 0.00 365
2004 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 4208.00 0.00 365
2005 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2980.00 0.00 365
2006 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 3070.00 0.00 365
2007 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2809.00 0.00 365
2008 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2620.00 0.00 366
2009 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 2496.00 0.00 365
2010 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC 0.00 0.00 0
2011 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2633.00 0.00 0
2012 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2182.00 0.00 366
2013 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 1895.00 0.00 365
2014 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 1448.00 0.00 365
2015 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2109.00 0.00 342
2016 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2610.00 0.00 366
2017 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2627.00 0.00 365
2018 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC 2340.00 44.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1985 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 2 365
1986 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 41 365
1987 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 10 365
1988 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 6 365
1989 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 10 365
1990 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 14 365
1991 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 9 365
1992 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 0 365
1993 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 9 365
1994 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 0 365
1995 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 0 365
1996 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 9 365
1997 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 0 365
1998 LOMA ENTERPRISES INC Brine 0 365
1999 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 91
2000 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2001 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2002 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2003 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2004 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2005 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2006 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2007 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2008 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 366
2009 EXCO - NORTH COAST ENERGY INC Brine 0 365
2010 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 365
2011 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0
2012 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 51 366
2013 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 365
2014 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 365
2015 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 342
2016 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 366
2017 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 5 365
2018 ENERVEST OPERATING LLC Brine 0 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
0000PL3731 Preliminary Restoration No Violations Preliminary Restoration done information from Data Point
0798243080 2012-05-22 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations I was on site today due to an oil and brine release at the tank battery. At the time of my arrival, the operator had started clean up work and had recovered 10 barrels of free product. Approximately 38 barrels of brine and 2 barrels of oil was released from the 100 barrel production tank. Operator had measured the tank on Friday, the tank had 48 inches of fluid in it. The cause of the leak was vandalism. The three inch valve at the bottom of the 100 barrel production tank had been removed, causing the release. The handle for the valve had been broken off, the right hand side of the valve had the paint chipped off of it. There was a large rock in the battery that had not been there on Friday. It is suspected that the rock was used to loosen the valve and the valve was backed off of its threads. The battery floor had approximately 10 barrels of crude oil and brine in it. The free product was removed with a vacuum truck. The dike is constructed out of sandy soil. Brine and oil seeped through the side of the dike on the south and west side. In the area immediately around the dike (within 10 feet), the top three inches of soil was saturated with brine and oil. The brine/oil flowed 200 feet south of the battery, following an intermittent drainage swail that ended in a low spot in the woods. The only indication of the brine was soil staining. The area has sandy soils and gravel to an unknown depth. Advised clean-up as follows: Remove grossly contaminated soil outside of the tank battery and replace the clean soil. Place booms in the intermittent drain way to prevent any residual product from spreading. Bio-remediation of the brine staining in the intermittent drainage way; mix lime and peat into soil as soil needed. Excavate a sump at the east and west corner of the battery, to allow free product to flow from the gravel floor of the battery. Steam clean side of production tank. Remove production tank from tank battery. Steam clean floor of the bat
1102264809 2012-06-11 Production Wells No Violations On 6/11/2012, I conducted an inspection on the clean-up from a spill on 5/22/2012. My inspection found that all contaminated soil/gravel had been removed, a new dike had been built, new gravel had been placed into the tank battery, and the oil/brine storage tank, separator, and well head were newly painted. Clean-up complete.
1337882058 2012-05-24 UrbanProduction Wells No Violations My inspection today found Perry the pumper for Enervest on location checking the status of the sump, that has been constructed inside the tank battery. Sump had 10 gallons of brine, oil and water mix in it. Pump truck was on the way to clean sump out. Operator had excavated and removed the tank battery dike. The operator had excavated below grade to remove all the sandy soil as I had advised. The operator back filled excavation with clay soil and built up a new dike with clay. The size of the new dike is more than sufficient to contain 110% of the volume of the 100 barrel production tank that is in the battery. Operator used the clean sandy soil that had been the dike as re-soiling material north of the battery as advised. Operator is going to monitor the sump and allow any remaining brine and oil to accumulate there, to be removed. Once all residual fluid is recovered sump will be filled in. The operator has lined the floor of the battery with limestone, there is a sufficient stockpile of limestone in the battery to complete lining once the sump is filled There had been an attempt by someone to steal the tank ladder that had been removed from the production tank during clean up. Ladder was in the lease road away from the site. The well is a plunger lift system well. The well head is in good repair. The heat treater separator is outside of the dike and way from the production tank. Spacing is correct at the facility. The identification sign is posted on the production tank. The lease road is constructed out of durable material and is stable.
798243080 2012-5-22 0:00: UP No Violations
PL3731 PL No Violations

For data sources see[9]

References