X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-115-24120

Well Details

Well ID: 34-115-24120
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Morgan
Municipality: Bristol Township
Operator Name: STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: CUNNINGHAM
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1990-12-26
Spud Date: 1990-01-24
Spud Drilling Contractor: R WOLFE DRLG
Final Drill Date: 1991-01-31
Well Total Depth: 1475.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 39.690000
Longitude: -81.800000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1988-12-23 471 EAGLE MOUNTAIN ENERGY GeoDate 12/23/88
Oil and Gas 1988-12-23 Issued Date 12/23/88 Expired Date 12/23/89 Acres 0010000 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation BEREA Proposed Depth 00000 Proposed Drill Depth 00000
CO 1990-12-26 471 EAGLE MOUNTAIN ENERGY GeoDate 12/26/90
Oil and Gas 1990-12-26 Issued Date 12/26/90 Expired Date 12/26/91 Acres 0010000 Tool Type RTA Proposed Formation BEREA Proposed Depth 01475 Proposed Drill Depth 01475
Original Spud 1991-01-30 RI 12-29-90
Completed 1991-01-31 RI 12-29-90
Reached Total Depth 1991-01-31 RI 12-29-90
Completion Report Received 1991-02-12 RI 12-29-90
Construction Permit Expires 1991-12-26 RI 12-29-90
Change of Owner 2003-08-11 Operator changed from 471, EAGLE MOUNTAIN ENERGY to 28, CGAS EXPLORATION
Change of Owner 2003-09-08 Operator changed from 471, EAGLE MOUNTAIN ENERGY to 28, CGAS EXPLORATION
Change of Owner 2007-04-27 Operator changed from 28, CGAS EXPLORATION to 7578, ENERVEST OPERATING LLC
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15 RI 12-29-90

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 1303 1335 0
1303 1335 0
2006-09-11 1320 1330 2
1320 1330 2
1303 1335 0

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
FOAM 0 600 Bbl 10000 FOAM FRAC

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1996 BT ENERGY CORP 0.00 0.00 0
1997 BT ENERGY CORP 0.00 0.00 0
1998 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 0
2000 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 0
2005 BT ENERGY CORP 0.00 0.00 0
2006 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 571.00 0.00 365
2007 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 235.00 0.00 365
2008 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 185.00 0.00 365
2009 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 538.00 0.00 365
2010 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 143.00 0.00 365
2011 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 0
2012 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 357
2013 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 365
2014 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 365
2015 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 357
2016 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 350
2017 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 315
2018 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC 0.00 0.00 280

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1996 BT ENERGY CORP Brine 0 0
1997 BT ENERGY CORP Brine 0 0
1998 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 0
2000 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 0
2005 BT ENERGY CORP Brine 0 0
2006 BT ENERGY CORP Brine 0 0
2007 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 365
2008 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 43 365
2009 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 20 365
2010 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 365
2011 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0
2012 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 357
2013 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 365
2014 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 365
2015 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 357
2016 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 350
2017 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 315
2018 STONEBRIDGE OPERATING CO LLC Brine 0 280

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-136944 2019-4-2 0:00:0 PW No Violations 0.50
-1501129413 2018-8-22 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-1946092474 2013-4-30 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-2124413286 2018-12-13 0:00 PW No Violations 0.50
-2136013100 2012-12-6 0:00: PW No Violations 1.50
-416758618 2017-1-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.00
-696653351 2012-2-2 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.00
-931077478 2013-9-4 0:00:0 PW No Violations 0.20
0000006322 Preliminary Restoration No Violations PASSED Y WITNESSED 6/28/91 INSPECTOR TOM HALL DATE 06/2819/91 DATA FROM OLD VAX INFO
0000136944 2019-04-02 Production Wells No Violations I was back on location today to do a follow-up inspection on this well. There has been no change in the status of this well. I spoke with the field supervisor John Schneider about their plan for this well and he stated they plan on plugging this well this year.
0371871597 2012-02-02 Production Wells No Violations FOLLOW UP TO NOV # -696653351 My inspection this day due to request from the landowner, Doug Emrick, to verify if the well is in production. I found gas well with valves shut, not capable of production. A small, 65 bbl tank is nearby and is not connected to the well. No identification was present. Northwood Energy has turned in production for 2010 and Stonebridge Operating has also turned in production for 2010 of 0 - only one operator needs to turn in production and which one is correct? Well needs plugged or put on TI list, identification needs posted and well needs placed on correct owners bond. I will give them a call and find out who owns the well. 2/24/12 - Enervest says they do not own well.
0416758618 2017-01-09 Production Wells No Violations The inspection today revealed that this well is equipped with a plunger lift system, a 8 5/8 inch diameter well surface casing at the surface, a 4 1/2 inch diameter wellhead, 1 1/2 inch diameter production tubing, and 2 inch diameter steel and plastic production lines. The valve on the wellhead is closed at the time of inspection. There are no associated tank with this well at the time of inspection. The well is idle at the time of inspection and there has been no resolution to the issue on this well.
0444013045 2012-12-27 Administrative Inspection No Violations I talked with Dave Crippen and he confirmed that they were going to bring in fill dirt to complete the removal of the dike sometime in the near future. He also said Stonebridge was talking of sending in a permit to plug this well.
0649210225 2014-03-13 Administrative Inspection No Violations Eddie Biehl asked the state for an extension of time until April 25 to evaluate this well and legal situation. In this time they will apply for either a permit to plug back and re-complete or to plug and abandon. He asked to then be allowed to utilize up to the full term of the permit to resolve outstanding legal issues including any pending or potential litigation in the local Court of Common Pleas. Once they are able to clear the legal issues, they will safely perform the work in the field.
0696653351 2012-02-02 Production Wells Violations Noted My inspection this day due to request from the landowner, Doug Emrick, to verify if the well is in production. I found gas well with valves shut, not capable of production. A small, 65 bbl tank is nearby and is not connected to the well. No identification was present. Northwood Energy has turned in production for 2010 and Stonebridge Operating has also turned in production for 2010 of 0 - only one operator needs to turn in production and which one is correct? Well needs plugged or put on TI list, identification needs posted and well needs placed on correct owners bond. I will give them a call and find out who owns the well. 2/24/12 - Enervest says they do not own well.
0779045021 2010-09-28 Production Wells No Violations Follow-up on NOV, In-Compliance.
0846949401 2018-03-13 Production Wells No Violations I was on location today to do a follow-up inspection on this well for being idle and incapable of production. Stonebridge was issued a compliance notice on 12/19/2013 for the violations on this well. At this time the well is still idle and incapable of production. All of the production valves are shut at the wellhead and all of the production equipment has been removed. No production has been reported on this well since 2010.
0912041264 2014-03-13 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: Identification has been posted at the wellhead and production has been reported as zero to the state. The well is still idle and there are no tanks or separators.
0931077478 2013-09-04 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: Well is still idle. There still has been no resolution to any of the issues.
0990980113 2012-12-27 Production Wells No Violations Well was not inspected. The dike, however has been cleared of all production equipment. Tenant said company came out and cleared small truckload of contamination and was going to be bringing back so fill dirt to finish job. They did not say when they were going to complete the removal of dike area. He said the landowner expressed concern over the dike area and believed contamination was more extensive than what they hauled away. I called Dave Crippen, Stonebridge well pumper, and left a message in regards to their plans. Dike is currently filled with water and ice.
1331507957 2011-06-15 Production Wells No Violations Inspection this day found well with rabbit, not in production. No IDs on tank. Landowner says well has not produced, Northwood had worked on it and set tank. I said Enervest is the operator of record. E-- waiting for a call back.
1345664058 2012-08-22 Administrative Inspection No Violations I received call today from Doug Emrick, Jr. saying lease had been broke and would like well plugged. When I asked who was operator, he thought it was Enervest. RBDMS shows very conflicting information and when NOV was mailed to Enervest, they called and said it was not their well. I explained that well already a citation and they had no time deadlines for plugging it.
1352149205 2012-10-17 Production Wells Violations Noted Well was not inspected. Tank Battery was inspected and ID was labeled as Cunninham 5-B. Diked area still exists with production equipment tangled in overgrown vegetation. Diked area also has oil and water contamination on surface all around and beyond the 1 100 barrel tank. Tank is empty and all flow lines have been disconnected. Meter is still hooked up but inactive and landowners renter stated he no longer receives house gas. All production equipment needs to be removed and diked area needs to be cleaned of contamination followed by restoration. I called Northwood and talked to Bill and he said the well equipment is not Northwoods. I called Enervest and Alan Tartlton stated the well was never in Enervests possession. Production is being reported by both Stonebridge and Northwood. I have told both Alan and Bill they need to correct their involvement in this situation with Columbus. Stonebridge has been contacted with no return call. Failure to comply may result in a forfeiture of Bond.
1355333310 2012-12-12 Administrative Inspection No Violations John Schneider left me a message today to inform me he was sending field worker to tank battery location today to remove remaining fluid from tank. He also stated in message that either this Thursday or Friday they would be out to remove the tank and production equipment.
1387486957 2013-12-19 Production Wells Violations Noted I received paperwork from the Doug Emrick, the landowner, showing a canceled lease filed by his attorney at the Morgan County Courthouse. The inspection revealed an idle well with 8 and 4 1/2 casing. All valves were shut at well head and there are flow lines, however Stonebridge removed the tank and separator from the dike. They also removed and restored the dike location. Operator must produce well within 30 days or plug the well within 90 days.
1387812805 2013-12-19 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: The operator has removed the tank and separator from the dike and cleaned up the contamination. They have also removed and restored the dike location. The compliance action -2136013100 is now void and a new produce or plug compliance action (1387486957) has been issued to Stonebridge.
1392998665 2014-02-21 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: The well is still idle and overgrown with sawbriar. The tank and separator have all been removed and Stonebridge has restored the dike, which is now being used as feeding area for cattle. Doug Emerick stated they receive no house gas from the well and they are in the process of breaking the lease with their attorney. I called and left a message with John Schneider in regards to the well issues.
1398695916 2014-04-28 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: The inspection revealed an idle well with 8 and 4 1/2 casing. All valves were shut at well head and there are flow lines, however Stonebridge removed the tank and separator from the dike. They also removed and restored the dike location.
1449717831 2012-11-06 Administrative Inspection No Violations Jim Schneider with Stonebridge called and left a message stating the pumper went out and looked at the dike issue and that they will start on cleanup. Only the tank battery was inspected for the Cunningham 5-B. I returned the call to Jim and left a voicemail stating the well was still showing up as Enervests and that needed to be corrected ASAP.
1501129413 2018-08-22 Production Wells No Violations I have returned to this well today to do a follow-up inspection on it. At this time the well is still sitting idle and incapable of production. The production valves on the well are currently closed making the well incapable of any type of production. The well is still in violation at this time.
1568384264 2019-9-13 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
1582726515 2020-2-26 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
1769645899 2012-11-13 Production Wells No Violations Stonebridge has recently been out to tank battery and cleared it of vegetation. Production equipment still on location and visible contamination still exists within dike. Valves are all shut off and there is no chart or meter. There is a house meter and one 100 barrel tank. Well head inspection revealed 8 and 4 1/2 casing. All valves were shut at well head. I called and left a message for John Schneider with Stonebridge to discuss cleanup and ownership discrepancy.
1913795995 2018-01-24 Production Wells No Violations I was on location today to do a follow-up inspection on this well. At this time the well is still idle and incapable of production. All of the production valves are shut at the wellhead and all of the production equipment has been removed.
1946092474 2013-04-30 Production Wells No Violations Compliance Action Follow-up -2136013100: There still has been no resolution to any of the issues. Well is still in non-compliance.
2036960463 2010-03-15 Production Wells Violations Noted An inspection of the well revealed no ID at the well or on storage tank, all producing leases shall be legibly identified in a conspicuous place on or near the well-head or the storage tank (s) as to owner, lease name, well number, permit number, county, and an emergency telephone number.
2124413286 2018-12-13 Production Wells No Violations I was back on location today to do a follow-up on this well. At this time the well is still idle and is not in production. I called John Schneider and am just waiting on a phone call back at this time.
2136013100 2012-12-06 Production Wells Violations Noted I called John Schneider with Stonebridge and left message this morning in regards to getting production equipment removed from area. John had left a message stating Enervest was working on the paperwork for the well. He left me a number for an Enervest representative named Amber. I called her and she told me ODNR DOGRM had corrected the ownership from Enervest to Stonebridge. RBDMS confirms this correction. She also stated that John Schneider had told her the well was in fact a Stonebridge well. I called John back and left a message that Stonebridge is now fully responsible for the well and production equipment and he needs to have it all removed and restored to original grade. I also explained that the actual well is incapable of producing and needs to be plugged.
371871597 2012-2-2 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.00
444013045 2012-12-27 0:00 AM No Violations
6322 PL No Violations
649210225 2014-3-13 0:00: AM No Violations
779045021 2010-9-28 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
846949401 2018-3-13 0:00: PW No Violations 0.60
912041264 2014-3-13 0:00: PW No Violations 2.00
990980113 2012-12-27 0:00 PW No Violations 2.00

Violations Commited

Inspection ID Violation ID Violation Date Violation Code Violation Comments
0696653351 US-OH-127890 2014-04-10 Failure to legibly identify well
0696653351 US-OH-127891 2014-04-10 Nonproduction; well shall be plugged or placed in temporary inactive status
1352149205 US-OH-110189 2013-10-22 Forfeiture of bond
1352149205 US-OH-110190 2013-10-22 Non urban - failure to meet tank battery setbacks from an inhabited structure
1387486957 US-OH-111486 2014-04-10 Well shall be plugged
1387486957 US-OH-111487 2014-04-10 Nonproduction; well shall be plugged or placed in temporary inactive status
2036960463 US-OH-120634 2010-03-16 Failure to legibly identify well
2136013100 US-OH-121900 2014-01-28 Forfeiture of bond
2136013100 US-OH-121901 2014-01-28 Failure to legibly identify well
2136013100 US-OH-121902 2014-01-28 Well shall be plugged
2136013100 US-OH-121903 2014-01-28 Failure to keep dike or pit free of brine or other wastes

For data sources see[9]

References