X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-029-21886

Well Details

Well ID: 34-029-21886
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Columbiana
Municipality: Fairfield Township
Operator Name: HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY
Well Pad ID: US-OH-001409
Farm/Lease Name: FAIRFIELD-UNKEFER
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2016-11-04
Spud Date: 2016-11-18
Spud Drilling Contractor: H&P DRILLING
Final Drill Date: 2017-01-08
Well Total Depth: 14743.00 ft
Configuration: Horizontal
Latitude: 40.820000
Longitude: -80.690000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2016-11-04 Proposed Formations:UTICA THRU POINT PLEASANT, Issued Date:11/4/2016, Expired Date:11/4/2018 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:864.14, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Correction to Well 2016-11-18 CORRECTION TO CASING PROGRAM PER OPERATOR.
Correction to Well 2016-12-16 CHANGE IN CASING PROGRAM
Reached Total Depth 2017-01-08
Correction to Well 2017-05-12 UPDATE TARGET/TAKEPOINT.ACREAGE AS DRILLED PLAT FEES RCVD 5/8/17-ALE
Completion Report Received 2017-05-22
Record Last Modified 2018-04-06
Construction Permit Expires 2018-11-04

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2017-04-12 9545 10595 24
2017-04-12 14427 14629 45
14427 14629 45
9545 10595 24
9545 10595 24

For data sources see[3]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 03/09/2017 03/17/2017 8235 11,246,700.0 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Sand (100 Mesh Proppant) Taylor Frac Proppant Silica Substrate 14808-60-7 100 2.38238 2,532,440.0
Sand (40/70 Proppant) Taylor Frac Proppant Silica Substrate 14808-60-7 100 9.06611 9,637,150.0
Other Chemical(s) Listed Above See Trade Name(s) List 2-Propyn-1-ol 107-19-7 5 0.00007189 76.419
Olefin Not Assigned 5 0.00007189 76.419
Petroleum Distillate 64742-47-8 20 0.000313707 333.466
2-Ethylhexanol 104-76-7 10 0.000143782 152.839
Methanol 67-56-1 35 0.000503238 534.935
Water 7732-18-5 44.3 0.00673298 7157.07
DETA phosphonate 15827-60-8 3 0.000280207 297.856
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated 68551-12-2 1.5 0.00002353 25.01
2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide 10222-01-2 5.8 0.00087544 930.581
Ammonium chloride ((NH4)Cl) 12125-02-9 2 0.00003137 33.347
Fatty acids, tall oil 61790-12-3 5 0.00007189 76.419
Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 40 0.0037361 3971.42
Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) 7647-01-0 28 0.0648717 68957.7
Phosphino carboxylic acid polymer 71050-62-9 3 0.000280207 297.856
Oleic Acid Diethanolamide 93-83-4 1.5 0.00002353 25.01
Alcohols, C14-15, ethoxylated 68951-67-7 5 0.00007189 76.419
Coconut oil acid diethanolamine 68603-42-9 5 0.00007189 76.419
Hexamethylene Triamine Penta (Methylene

Phosphonic Acid)

34690-00-1 3 0.000280207 297.856
Copolymer of Maleic and Acrylic Acid 52255-49-9 10 0.000934024 992.855
K-BAC 1005 WST Biocide Water 7732-18-5 44.3 0.00673298 7157.07
2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide 10222-01-2 5.8 0.00087544 930.581
Polyethylene glycol 25322-68-3 50 0.00759931 8077.96
Hydrochloric Acid (28%) FSTI Acidizing Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) 7647-01-0 28 0.0648717 68957.7
Water 7732-18-5 72 0.166813 177320
Plexslick 957 Solvay Friction Reducer Water 7732-18-5 60 0.000941121 1000.4
Ammonium chloride ((NH4)Cl) 12125-02-9 2 0.00003137 33.347
Oleic Acid Diethanolamide 93-83-4 1.5 0.00002353 25.01
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated 68551-12-2 1.5 0.00002353 25.01
Petroleum Distillate 64742-47-8 20 0.000313707 333.466
NEFE-180 Chemplex Corrosion Inhibitor/Iron Control Acetic acid 64-19-7 65 0.000934585 993.451
Fatty acids, tall oil 61790-12-3 5 0.00007189 76.419
2-Propyn-1-ol 107-19-7 5 0.00007189 76.419
Coconut oil acid diethanolamine 68603-42-9 5 0.00007189 76.419
Methanol 67-56-1 35 0.000503238 534.935
Olefin Not Assigned 5 0.00007189 76.419
2-Ethylhexanol 104-76-7 10 0.000143782 152.839
Alcohols, C14-15, ethoxylated 68951-67-7 5 0.00007189 76.419
Water Company 1 Carrier/Base Fluid Water 7732-18-5 100 88.2923 93,853,500.0
SI-1171LF WST Scale Inibitor Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 40 0.0037361 3971.42
Hexamethylene Triamine Penta (Methylene

Phosphonic Acid)

34690-00-1 3 0.000280207 297.856
Phosphino carboxylic acid polymer 71050-62-9 3 0.000280207 297.856
Water 7732-18-5 80 0.00747219 7942.84
Copolymer of Maleic and Acrylic Acid 52255-49-9 10 0.000934024 992.855
DETA phosphonate 15827-60-8 3 0.000280207 297.856

For data sources see[4]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
2017-03-16 H2O 7 535164 Gal 0 STINGRAY PRESSURE PUMPING LLC STAGE 25/25

STAGES 2-24 SEE IMAGES

2017-03-08 H2O 7 447888 Gal 0 STINGRAY PRESSURE PUMPING LLC STAGE 1/25

STAGES 2-24 SEE IMAGES

For data sources see[5]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2017 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY 1656292 0 234
2018 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY 1371811 0 301
2019 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY 259397 0 90

For data sources see[6] [7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2017 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY Brine 24991 234
2018 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY Brine 10533 301
2019 HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY Brine 1978 90

For data sources see[8] [9]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1196310224 2017-7-17 0:00: PW No Violations 1.50
-534867302 2017-2-14 0:00: CT No Violations 1.00
-760577248 2017-3-29 0:00: SC No Violations 0.50
0152932575 2017-07-10 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to respond to complaint # 5645. The complainant, Mr. Bryan Wisler stated that he was hearing loud pressure release noises coming from the pad. While on location I did not experience any sounds of excessive pressure release. I did observe that a gas dehydration unit was removed from location. I called and spoke with Hilcorp Energy wellsite supervisor Kenneth Shimek regarding the complaint and equipment. Mr. Shimek stated that the unit had been removed and that the production system was blew down and sent to the vapor recovery flare. He continued any other releases were due to choke changes on the well to optimize production. While on location I did not experience any audible pressure releases. I will contact Mr. Wisler concerning the source and cause of the release.
0534867302 2017-02-14 Completion Testing No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to document the status of completion testing well #2-1886-00-00. On 2/14/2017 I received an E-mail from Stephanie McMurray with Hilcorp Energy stating that hydraulic fracturing was to occur beginning the week of 2/20/2017. At the time of my inspection the drilling rig and related equipment were off location. A steel grate was placed over the cellar to prevent falls. The cellar contained a minimal amount of water. I did not observe any audible or visual leaks from the well head. I met with Hilcorp Energy Senior Wellsite Supervisor Kenneth Shimek to discuss plans for the pad. Mr. Shimek stated that a coil tubing unit was scheduled to make a clean out run on the production casing followed by pressure tests prior to stimulation. Stimulation would be occurring on or before 3/1/2017. I communicated to Mr. Shimek the requirement to notify an inspector at least 24 hours prior to commencing stimulation. I will plan to witness the stimulation work once it commences.
0760577248 2017-03-29 Surface Facility Construction No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to conduct a status check on the construction of production equipment following hydraulic fracturing. Per Hilcorp Senior Wellsite Supervisor Kenneth Shimek, tubing installation had been completed. At the time of my inspection, production equipment construction was in process. There was some minor ponding of fresh water around the well heads. Erosion and sedimentation controls remained in place and functioning. I did not observe water migrating off of the pad or creating erosion or sedimentation concerns. No violations were observed during this inspection.
1168471431 2016-12-28 Casing String Witnessed No Violations

-

1196310224 2017-07-17 Production Wells No Violations The purpose of my inspection was in response to complaint # 5645. The complainant, Mr. Bryan Wisler, stated that he was audibly detecting periodic noises that were described to sound like pressure releases. While on location I witnessed Hilcorp Energy representatives changing chokes in the well to optimize production. After shutting the well in from production, trapped pressure in the flow line was released to an open top tank placed on containment. The release was brief and did not necessitate hearing protection when standing at a distance. I will contact the complainant to explain the source of his observation.
1483970656 2017-01-09 Casing String Witnessed No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to document the production casing cement job. I arrived on location as Baker Hughes was displacing KCL treated water. A review of the supplied parameter chart indicates the job occurred as planned. No issues were reported by company representatives.
1498219545 2017-06-23 Preliminary Restoration No Violations The purpose of my inspection was to assess the status of preliminary restoration. Weather conditions were overcast and raining. A sign board containing required and correct information was present at the entrance of the location. The lease road was stable and drivable. Vegetation was well-established along the berm. The topsoil stockpile was reclaimed and cultivated by the surface owner. Vegetation was growing well around the well pad. Erosion and sedimentation controls remained in place and functioning. The drilling pad was composed of crushed gravel. There was some standing water present on the pad. An earthen berm stabilized with vegetation remained on the North, West and East sides of the pad. A closed-loop, above-ground drilling pit system was used, so there are no earthen pits requiring closure. The well was hydraulically fractured and placed in production. Correct and legible identification was present at the well head. The cellar was covered with a steel grate. Water was at freeboard. The mousehole could not be observed. No leaks were observed. The tank battery consisted of a GPU, dehy unit and two (2) 400 bbl frac tanks inside a lined steel containment. Vapor recovery from was connected to a functioning flare stack. The vendor tasked with pipelining the well still had pipe and assorted equipment left on the pad. The location meets the requirements of preliminary restoration.
152932575 2017-7-10 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00

For data sources see[10]

References