If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 34-029-21886 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.82,"lon":-80.69,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Columbiana | |
Municipality: Fairfield Township | |
Operator Name: HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | |
Well Pad ID: US-OH-001409 | |
Farm/Lease Name: FAIRFIELD-UNKEFER | |
License Status: Producing | |
License Date: 2016-11-04 | |
Spud Date: 2016-11-18 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: H&P DRILLING | |
Final Drill Date: 2017-01-08 | |
Well Total Depth: 14743.00 ft | |
Configuration: Horizontal | |
Latitude: 40.820000 | |
Longitude: -80.690000 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
APP | 2016-11-04 | Proposed Formations:UTICA THRU POINT PLEASANT, Issued Date:11/4/2016, Expired Date:11/4/2018 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:864.14, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL |
Correction to Well | 2016-11-18 | CORRECTION TO CASING PROGRAM PER OPERATOR. |
Correction to Well | 2016-12-16 | CHANGE IN CASING PROGRAM |
Reached Total Depth | 2017-01-08 | |
Correction to Well | 2017-05-12 | UPDATE TARGET/TAKEPOINT.ACREAGE AS DRILLED PLAT FEES RCVD 5/8/17-ALE |
Completion Report Received | 2017-05-22 | |
Record Last Modified | 2018-04-06 | |
Construction Permit Expires | 2018-11-04 |
For data sources see[2]
Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
---|---|---|---|
2017-04-12 | 9545 | 10595 | 24 |
2017-04-12 | 14427 | 14629 | 45 |
14427 | 14629 | 45 | |
9545 | 10595 | 24 | |
9545 | 10595 | 24 |
For data sources see[3]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 03/09/2017 | 03/17/2017 | 8235 | 11,246,700.0 | 0 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sand (100 Mesh Proppant) | Taylor Frac | Proppant | Silica Substrate | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 2.38238 | 2,532,440.0 |
Sand (40/70 Proppant) | Taylor Frac | Proppant | Silica Substrate | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 9.06611 | 9,637,150.0 | |
Other Chemical(s) | Listed Above | See Trade Name(s) List | 2-Propyn-1-ol | 107-19-7 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | |
Olefin | Not Assigned | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Petroleum Distillate | 64742-47-8 | 20 | 0.000313707 | 333.466 | ||||
2-Ethylhexanol | 104-76-7 | 10 | 0.000143782 | 152.839 | ||||
Methanol | 67-56-1 | 35 | 0.000503238 | 534.935 | ||||
Water | 7732-18-5 | 44.3 | 0.00673298 | 7157.07 | ||||
DETA phosphonate | 15827-60-8 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 | ||||
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated | 68551-12-2 | 1.5 | 0.00002353 | 25.01 | ||||
2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide | 10222-01-2 | 5.8 | 0.00087544 | 930.581 | ||||
Ammonium chloride ((NH4)Cl) | 12125-02-9 | 2 | 0.00003137 | 33.347 | ||||
Fatty acids, tall oil | 61790-12-3 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Ethylene glycol | 107-21-1 | 40 | 0.0037361 | 3971.42 | ||||
Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) | 7647-01-0 | 28 | 0.0648717 | 68957.7 | ||||
Phosphino carboxylic acid polymer | 71050-62-9 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 | ||||
Oleic Acid Diethanolamide | 93-83-4 | 1.5 | 0.00002353 | 25.01 | ||||
Alcohols, C14-15, ethoxylated | 68951-67-7 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Coconut oil acid diethanolamine | 68603-42-9 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Hexamethylene Triamine Penta (Methylene
Phosphonic Acid) |
34690-00-1 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 | ||||
Copolymer of Maleic and Acrylic Acid | 52255-49-9 | 10 | 0.000934024 | 992.855 | ||||
K-BAC 1005 | WST | Biocide | Water | 7732-18-5 | 44.3 | 0.00673298 | 7157.07 | |
2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide | 10222-01-2 | 5.8 | 0.00087544 | 930.581 | ||||
Polyethylene glycol | 25322-68-3 | 50 | 0.00759931 | 8077.96 | ||||
Hydrochloric Acid (28%) | FSTI | Acidizing | Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) | 7647-01-0 | 28 | 0.0648717 | 68957.7 | |
Water | 7732-18-5 | 72 | 0.166813 | 177320 | ||||
Plexslick 957 | Solvay | Friction Reducer | Water | 7732-18-5 | 60 | 0.000941121 | 1000.4 | |
Ammonium chloride ((NH4)Cl) | 12125-02-9 | 2 | 0.00003137 | 33.347 | ||||
Oleic Acid Diethanolamide | 93-83-4 | 1.5 | 0.00002353 | 25.01 | ||||
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated | 68551-12-2 | 1.5 | 0.00002353 | 25.01 | ||||
Petroleum Distillate | 64742-47-8 | 20 | 0.000313707 | 333.466 | ||||
NEFE-180 | Chemplex | Corrosion Inhibitor/Iron Control | Acetic acid | 64-19-7 | 65 | 0.000934585 | 993.451 | |
Fatty acids, tall oil | 61790-12-3 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
2-Propyn-1-ol | 107-19-7 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Coconut oil acid diethanolamine | 68603-42-9 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Methanol | 67-56-1 | 35 | 0.000503238 | 534.935 | ||||
Olefin | Not Assigned | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
2-Ethylhexanol | 104-76-7 | 10 | 0.000143782 | 152.839 | ||||
Alcohols, C14-15, ethoxylated | 68951-67-7 | 5 | 0.00007189 | 76.419 | ||||
Water | Company 1 | Carrier/Base Fluid | Water | 7732-18-5 | 100 | 88.2923 | 93,853,500.0 | |
SI-1171LF | WST | Scale Inibitor | Ethylene glycol | 107-21-1 | 40 | 0.0037361 | 3971.42 | |
Hexamethylene Triamine Penta (Methylene
Phosphonic Acid) |
34690-00-1 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 | ||||
Phosphino carboxylic acid polymer | 71050-62-9 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 | ||||
Water | 7732-18-5 | 80 | 0.00747219 | 7942.84 | ||||
Copolymer of Maleic and Acrylic Acid | 52255-49-9 | 10 | 0.000934024 | 992.855 | ||||
DETA phosphonate | 15827-60-8 | 3 | 0.000280207 | 297.856 |
For data sources see[4]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-03-16 | H2O | 7 | 535164 Gal | 0 | STINGRAY PRESSURE PUMPING LLC | STAGE 25/25
STAGES 2-24 SEE IMAGES |
2017-03-08 | H2O | 7 | 447888 Gal | 0 | STINGRAY PRESSURE PUMPING LLC | STAGE 1/25
STAGES 2-24 SEE IMAGES |
For data sources see[5]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | 1656292 | 0 | 234 |
2018 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | 1371811 | 0 | 301 |
2019 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | 259397 | 0 | 90 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | Brine | 24991 | 234 |
2018 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | Brine | 10533 | 301 |
2019 | HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY | Brine | 1978 | 90 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
-1196310224 | 2017-7-17 0:00: | PW | No Violations | 1.50 |
-534867302 | 2017-2-14 0:00: | CT | No Violations | 1.00 |
-760577248 | 2017-3-29 0:00: | SC | No Violations | 0.50 |
0152932575 | 2017-07-10 | Production Wells | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was to respond to complaint # 5645. The complainant, Mr. Bryan Wisler stated that he was hearing loud pressure release noises coming from the pad. While on location I did not experience any sounds of excessive pressure release. I did observe that a gas dehydration unit was removed from location. I called and spoke with Hilcorp Energy wellsite supervisor Kenneth Shimek regarding the complaint and equipment. Mr. Shimek stated that the unit had been removed and that the production system was blew down and sent to the vapor recovery flare. He continued any other releases were due to choke changes on the well to optimize production. While on location I did not experience any audible pressure releases. I will contact Mr. Wisler concerning the source and cause of the release. |
0534867302 | 2017-02-14 | Completion Testing | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was to document the status of completion testing well #2-1886-00-00. On 2/14/2017 I received an E-mail from Stephanie McMurray with Hilcorp Energy stating that hydraulic fracturing was to occur beginning the week of 2/20/2017. At the time of my inspection the drilling rig and related equipment were off location. A steel grate was placed over the cellar to prevent falls. The cellar contained a minimal amount of water. I did not observe any audible or visual leaks from the well head. I met with Hilcorp Energy Senior Wellsite Supervisor Kenneth Shimek to discuss plans for the pad. Mr. Shimek stated that a coil tubing unit was scheduled to make a clean out run on the production casing followed by pressure tests prior to stimulation. Stimulation would be occurring on or before 3/1/2017. I communicated to Mr. Shimek the requirement to notify an inspector at least 24 hours prior to commencing stimulation. I will plan to witness the stimulation work once it commences. |
0760577248 | 2017-03-29 | Surface Facility Construction | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was to conduct a status check on the construction of production equipment following hydraulic fracturing. Per Hilcorp Senior Wellsite Supervisor Kenneth Shimek, tubing installation had been completed. At the time of my inspection, production equipment construction was in process. There was some minor ponding of fresh water around the well heads. Erosion and sedimentation controls remained in place and functioning. I did not observe water migrating off of the pad or creating erosion or sedimentation concerns. No violations were observed during this inspection. |
1168471431 | 2016-12-28 | Casing String Witnessed | No Violations
- | |
1196310224 | 2017-07-17 | Production Wells | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was in response to complaint # 5645. The complainant, Mr. Bryan Wisler, stated that he was audibly detecting periodic noises that were described to sound like pressure releases. While on location I witnessed Hilcorp Energy representatives changing chokes in the well to optimize production. After shutting the well in from production, trapped pressure in the flow line was released to an open top tank placed on containment. The release was brief and did not necessitate hearing protection when standing at a distance. I will contact the complainant to explain the source of his observation. |
1483970656 | 2017-01-09 | Casing String Witnessed | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was to document the production casing cement job. I arrived on location as Baker Hughes was displacing KCL treated water. A review of the supplied parameter chart indicates the job occurred as planned. No issues were reported by company representatives. |
1498219545 | 2017-06-23 | Preliminary Restoration | No Violations | The purpose of my inspection was to assess the status of preliminary restoration. Weather conditions were overcast and raining. A sign board containing required and correct information was present at the entrance of the location. The lease road was stable and drivable. Vegetation was well-established along the berm. The topsoil stockpile was reclaimed and cultivated by the surface owner. Vegetation was growing well around the well pad. Erosion and sedimentation controls remained in place and functioning. The drilling pad was composed of crushed gravel. There was some standing water present on the pad. An earthen berm stabilized with vegetation remained on the North, West and East sides of the pad. A closed-loop, above-ground drilling pit system was used, so there are no earthen pits requiring closure. The well was hydraulically fractured and placed in production. Correct and legible identification was present at the well head. The cellar was covered with a steel grate. Water was at freeboard. The mousehole could not be observed. No leaks were observed. The tank battery consisted of a GPU, dehy unit and two (2) 400 bbl frac tanks inside a lined steel containment. Vapor recovery from was connected to a functioning flare stack. The vendor tasked with pipelining the well still had pipe and assorted equipment left on the pad. The location meets the requirements of preliminary restoration. |
152932575 | 2017-7-10 0:00: | PW | No Violations | 1.00 |
For data sources see[10]