If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-115-21395 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.871997,"lon":-75.665372,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Susquehanna | |
| Municipality: New Milford Township | |
| Operator Name: SWN PROD CO LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: 149710 | |
| Farm/Lease Name: KOZIOL 5H | |
| License Status: | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: 2013-08-08 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: Y | |
| Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
| Conservation: No | |
| Latitude: 41.871997 | |
| Longitude: -75.665372 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2013-08-08 | New Permit Application |
| 2013-11-22 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 2013-12-16 | New Permit Application |
| 2014-01-22 | Drilling Completion |
| 2014-02-25 | Perforation |
| 2014-03-12 | Performed Stimulation |
| 2014-05-01 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
| Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014-03-12 | 2014-03-16 | 6,684 | 6,307,900 | 0 |
| Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EC6486 | Nalco | Scale Inhibitor | Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 30 | 0.00294938 | 1814.51 |
| FRA-405 | Clearwater | Friction Reducer | Ammonium Chloride | 12125-02-9 | 7 | 0.00483733 | 2976.01 | |
| Sodium Chloride | 7647-14-5 | 10 | 0.00691047 | 4251.44 | ||||
| Petroleum Distillates | 64742-47-8 | 40 | 0.0276419 | 17005.8 | ||||
| Alcohols, C-12-16, Ethoxylated | 68551-12-2 | 7 | 0.00483733 | 2976.01 | ||||
| K Bac -1020 | WST | Biocide | Polyethylene glycol | 25322-68-3 | 60 | 0.00701448 | 4315.43 | |
| 2,2-Diobrom-3nirilopropionamide | 10222-01-2 | 20 | 0.00233816 | 1438.48 | ||||
| 15% HCl | Reagent | Acid | HCL | 7647-01-0 | 15 | 0.146756 | 90287.1 | |
| Water | SWN | Water / Produced Water | H2O + Disolved Salts | 7732-18-5 | 100 | 85.2198 | 52,428,700.0 | |
| Sand | Keane | Sand | Crystalline Silica, Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 13.7088 | 8,433,880.0 | |
| AI-600 | Weatherford | Acid Inhibitor | Isopropyl Alchol | 67-63-0 | 7 | 0.000171216 | 105.335 | |
| Tar bases, quinoline derivs, benzyl chloride-quaternized | 72480-70-7 | 13 | 0.000317972 | 195.622 | ||||
| N,N-Dimethylformamide | 68-12-2 | 40 | 0.000978375 | 601.914 | ||||
| Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 60 | 0.00146756 | 902.871 | ||||
| 2-Butoxyethanol | 111-76-2 | 7 | 0.000171216 | 105.335 | ||||
| Ethoxylated Nonylphenol | 68412-54-4 | 10 | 0.000244594 | 150.479 | ||||
| Cinnamaldehyde | 104-55-2 | 10 | 0.000244594 | 150.479 | ||||
| Triethyl Phosphate | 78-40-0 | 7 | 0.000171216 | 105.335 |
For data sources see[5]
| Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-03-12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | 1,566,187.00 | 253 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 1,196,941.00 | 290 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 1,060,411.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 603,704.00 | 363 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 383,198.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | 316,907.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Drill Cuttings | 1,132.67 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
| 2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 150.48 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
| 2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Drill Cuttings | 395.75 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
| 2014 | SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 8,126.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2015 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 9,940.20 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 50.75 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,993.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,714.80 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2017 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 58.40 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 37.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 1,453.40 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 161.80 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 363.20 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 363.43 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2018 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 3.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 317.60 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 83.78 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 22.00 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 826342 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 43.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC035 |
| 2019 | SWN PROD CO LLC | Produced Fluid | 915.80 Bbl | SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT | 95-16-65420-013 |
For data sources see[8]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2233386 | Primary Facility | 2013-12-23 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | |
| 2352004 | Primary Facility | 2015-03-13 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I visited the Koziol pad on 3/13/2015. There were 5 active wells on the pad; the 1H, 5H, and 6H all had production trees in place with pressure on them but were shut in to the production line out. The 1H was showing a pressure of 1423psi at crown gauge and 1429 at the wing valve. The 5H showed 1829 psi at the wing valve gauge. Production line valve was shut with -5 psi on gauge on production line. The 6H was also shut in from production with a pressure of 1774psi on gauge on wing valve. The cellars on these wells were completely filled with gravel. The 2H and 4H were not in production at time of inspection. Entire BOP stack was present on these wells. Workover completions foreman said they were waiting on rig to come in and run tubing on these wells. Cellars were filled with water and free of bubbling. |
| 2375733 | Primary Facility | 2015-06-03 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2436543 | Primary Facility | 2015-12-18 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 12/18/15, the Department conducted an inspection of the SWN RU 26 Koziol Well Pad in response to a reported release of 34 gallons of fresh water off containment. Present during the inspection were myself, Jon Sassi, Department EPS, and Eric Rooney, Department Professional Geologist. The inspection revealed that the pad was being utilized as a remote pump station for hydraulic fracturing activities for other locations. As evidenced in the attached photograph, the containment for the pump appeared to be adequate. Conductivity readings conducted around the pump station suggested that the spill was indeed a fresh water spill. No further action will be taken by the Department. |
| 2444392 | Primary Facility | 2016-01-28 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2478413 | Primary Facility | 2016-04-26 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2488166 | Primary Facility | 2016-05-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2501674 | Primary Facility | 2016-07-15 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2581656 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-11 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 12:50p.m.
The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. The (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and set up with a Taylor plug to check for pressure with a Crystal pressure gauge, the valve going to the production tank was closed. There was 464psi on the production casing and 398psi on the production line. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 13:35p.m. |
| 2687375 | Primary Facility | 2018-01-25 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and was unable to check for gas at the perimeter of cellar because the gravel was frozen. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
| 2785997 | Primary Facility | 2018-10-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of gravel and there was no gas detected at the perimeter of the cellar. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
For data sources see[9]