X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-20395

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-20395
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Forest Lake Township
Operator Name: CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: BAKER 2H
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 2010-07-15
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.883950
Longitude: -75.992386

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2010-07-15 New Permit Application

For data sources see[4]


Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2010 CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2011 CARRIZO (MARCELLUS) LLC 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[5]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
1928308 Primary Facility 2010-11-17 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted This site is currently being constructed. No 7 day notice was received by the Department that construction had begun. There was no ESCGP on site. The issues that were noteworthy were the topsoil pile on the North end requires mulching and seeding, the filter sock on the north side is not on the contour, and there is a check dam installed in the sediment trap. The check dam does not conform with the ESCGP that I had on hand to conduct the inspection. I spoke with Company Man, Jeff Myers, about the issues. I have emailed Carrizo Staff regarding the plan and notice but have not received a response. I will reinspect this site.
1949297 Primary Facility 2011-02-12 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted 165 Gallons of diesel fuel spilled on to containment due to an absent minded fuel handler. The fuel was vacuumed up. I did not observe any evidence that the spill left the containment, however, I will reinspect the site when the equipment is removed to attempt to determine if the spill had left containment.
1955399 Primary Facility 2011-03-08 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted

For data sources see[6]

References