X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "EIA’s projections for individual tight oil plays"

m (added image)
(changed "forecast" to "projection"; added images; fixed links (deleted pipes, double brackets))
Line 1: Line 1:
The EIA gave me their long-term projections—previously unpublished—for oil production from individual tight plays, including the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Spraberry and more, out to 2040. These are the areas wholly responsible for the U.S. oil boom of the past several years, so I’d think there would be wide interest in EIA’s forecasts for particular plays. Yet the EIA has not released these forecasts themselves.
+
The EIA gave me their long-term projections—previously unpublished—for oil production from individual tight plays, including the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Spraberry and more, out to 2040. These are the areas wholly responsible for the U.S. oil boom of the past several years, so I’d think there would be wide interest in EIA’s projections for particular plays. Yet the EIA has not released these projections themselves.
  
 
I’m posting the data here—freely available—for anyone who is interested. First I’ll show the data, then list links for downloading this data set and some other related data. Finally I’ll tell more about how I got the data, and put it in context.
 
I’m posting the data here—freely available—for anyone who is interested. First I’ll show the data, then list links for downloading this data set and some other related data. Finally I’ll tell more about how I got the data, and put it in context.
Line 9: Line 9:
 
To download these data sets as xlsx files, follow the links below to the xlsx pages, then click the button “RAW.”
 
To download these data sets as xlsx files, follow the links below to the xlsx pages, then click the button “RAW.”
  
1. tight oil production forecasts from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2014 [not previously published]: [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2014_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.csv|csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2014_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.xlsx|xlsx] file.
+
1. tight oil production projections from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2014 [not previously published]: [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2014_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.csv csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2014_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.xlsx xlsx file].
  
2. tight oil production forecasts from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2013 ([http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/aeo13/source_oil_all.cfm#tight_oil|published in that report]): [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2013_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.csv|csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2013_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.xlsx|xlsx] file.
+
2. tight oil production projections from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2013 ([http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/aeo13/source_oil_all.cfm#tight_oil published in that report]): [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2013_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.csv csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/AEO_2013_tight_oil_by_play_forecast.xlsx xlsx file].
  
3. EIA’s historical tight oil production data, through May 2014 [not previously published]: [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/US_tight_oil_by_play_historical_2000_to_May_2014.csv|csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/US_tight_oil_by_play_historical_2000_to_May_2014.xlsx|xlsx file].
+
3. EIA’s historical tight oil production data, through May 2014 [not previously published]: [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/US_tight_oil_by_play_historical_2000_to_May_2014.csv csv file] and [https://github.com/the-frack-lab/data/blob/master/oil/EIA/US_tight_oil_by_play_historical_2000_to_May_2014.xlsx xlsx file].
  
== EIA’s tight oil forecasts ==
+
== EIA’s tight oil projections ==
  
In their 2014 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), EIA forecast that tight oil production will continue rising for only a few more years, then stay on a plateau for a few years, and finally enter a slow decline. If correct, this would mean the U.S. oil boom would soon end—or, it would mean the transition of tight oil production, from a boom phase to a mature phase.
+
In their 2014 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), EIA's reference case projection showed tight oil production continuing to rise for only a few more years, then staying on a plateau for a few years, and finally entering a slow decline. If correct, this would mean the U.S. oil boom would soon end—or, it would mean the transition of tight oil production, from a boom phase of rapidly rising production to a mature phase of steady and then falling production.
  
 
[[File:2014 EIA AEO (early) Fig 1 - US liquid fuels by source 1970-2040.png|600px]]
 
[[File:2014 EIA AEO (early) Fig 1 - US liquid fuels by source 1970-2040.png|600px]]
Line 23: Line 23:
 
''Figure 1 from EIA’s AEO 2014 (early release).''
 
''Figure 1 from EIA’s AEO 2014 (early release).''
  
That 2014 forecast for tight oil, and for total oil production, was considerably higher than the tight oil forecasts in their earlier AEOs.  
+
That 2014 projection for tight oil, and for total oil production, was considerably higher than the tight oil projections in their earlier AEOs.  
  
[US tight oil 2012 vs 2013 vs 2014]
+
[[File:US tight oil forecasts (EIA AEO 2012-2014).png|600px]]
  
So naturally I was curious to find out what that higher forecast in 2014 was based on. Their 2013 annual report had shown a breakdown like this, with the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Permian (which is actually a collection of different plays), and an “other” category.
+
So naturally I was curious to find out what that higher projection in 2014 was based on. Their 2013 annual report had shown a breakdown like this, with the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Permian (which is actually a collection of different plays), and an “other” category.
  
[FIG 97]
+
[[File:2013_EIA_AEO_tight_oil_by_play_2008-2040.png|600px]]
  
EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2013, Figure 97.
+
''[http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/archive.cfm EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2013], Figure 97.''
  
The 2014 annual report didn’t show any breakdown like this for all the individual plays. But it did show a forecast for Eagle Ford—so I figured they’d continued making forecasts for other plays. I got a hold of one of their analysts to ask—and it turned out they had made even more detailed forecasts than I expected, covering more than ten different plays. They sent me the year-by-year data points out to 2040—which also included historical data for each play back to 2000.
+
The 2014 annual report didn’t show any breakdown like this for all the individual plays. But it did show a [http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/tight_oil.cfm projection for Eagle Ford]—so I figured they’d continued making projections for other plays. I got a hold of one of their analysts to ask—and it turned out they had made even more detailed projections than I expected, covering more than ten different plays. They sent me the year-by-year data points out to 2040—which also included historical data for each play back to 2000.
  
I think everyone should have easy access to this data—both historical and forecast—so I’ve posted them on Github (links above). A new report out today, “Drilling Down,” compares these same EIA forecasts against his own forecasts. (I’ll write more about Hughes’ report in later posts.)
+
I think everyone should have easy access to this data—both historical and projected—so I’ve posted them on Github (links above). A new report out today, “[http://www.postcarbon.org/drilling-deeper Drilling Deeper],” compares these same EIA projections against his own. (I’ll write more about Hughes’ report in later posts.)
EIA’s historical tight oil data
 
  
It’s not easy to get a hold of good historical data on the individual plays—that is, without having a subscription to an expensive database like DrillingInfo. The EIA does show historical production by play for natural gas from shale plays (although as I pointed out in an earlier post, “The original shale gas field is tanking,” the recent months of data may be only estimates—and may get revised).
+
== EIA’s historical tight oil data ==
 +
 
 +
It’s not easy to get a hold of good historical data on the individual plays—that is, without having a subscription to an expensive database like DrillingInfo. The EIA does show [https://www.beaconreader.com/mason-inman/www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly historical production by play] for natural gas from shale plays (although as I pointed out in an earlier post, “[https://www.beaconreader.com/mason-inman/the-original-shale-gas-field-is-tanking The original shale gas field is tanking],” the recent months of data may be only estimates—and may get revised).
  
 
For whatever reason, they don’t provide data on tight oil by play. But in presentations and in posts in their “Today in Energy” series, they do sometimes show graphs of the production by play, like this:
 
For whatever reason, they don’t provide data on tight oil by play. But in presentations and in posts in their “Today in Energy” series, they do sometimes show graphs of the production by play, like this:
  
[Sieminski presentation]
+
[[File:US shale and tight oil through early 2014 by play (Sieminski slides).png|600px]]
  
Historical data on tight oil production by play, from September 2014 presentation by EIA executive director Adam Sieminski. The slides noted: “Sources: EIA derived from state administrative data collected by DrillingInfo Inc. Data are through July 2014 and represent EIA’s official tight oil & shale gas estimates, but are not survey data. State abbreviations indicate primary state(s).”
+
''Historical data on tight oil production by play, from [http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_09292014.pdf September 2014 presentation] by EIA executive director Adam Sieminski. The slides noted: “Sources: EIA derived from state administrative data collected by DrillingInfo Inc. Data are through July 2014 and represent EIA’s official tight oil & shale gas estimates, but are not survey data. State abbreviations indicate primary state(s).”''
  
 
Every month I gather the latest numbers of production of shale gas by play, from EIA’s Natural Gas Weekly Update. In June, when I downloaded the latest data set, I was initially confused. It was listing a different set of plays than usual. I realized it was actually the data for tight oil production by play. They’d accidentally posted the wrong data set, and soon after fixed that. But that gave me monthly production numbers from Jan 2000 to May 2014—a great collection of data to have. The link to that set is above as well.
 
Every month I gather the latest numbers of production of shale gas by play, from EIA’s Natural Gas Weekly Update. In June, when I downloaded the latest data set, I was initially confused. It was listing a different set of plays than usual. I realized it was actually the data for tight oil production by play. They’d accidentally posted the wrong data set, and soon after fixed that. But that gave me monthly production numbers from Jan 2000 to May 2014—a great collection of data to have. The link to that set is above as well.
  
 
For what it’s worth, this historical data for each play closely matches the historical portion of the AEO 2014 data I got from EIA.
 
For what it’s worth, this historical data for each play closely matches the historical portion of the AEO 2014 data I got from EIA.

Revision as of 11:50, 2 January 2015

The EIA gave me their long-term projections—previously unpublished—for oil production from individual tight plays, including the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Spraberry and more, out to 2040. These are the areas wholly responsible for the U.S. oil boom of the past several years, so I’d think there would be wide interest in EIA’s projections for particular plays. Yet the EIA has not released these projections themselves.

I’m posting the data here—freely available—for anyone who is interested. First I’ll show the data, then list links for downloading this data set and some other related data. Finally I’ll tell more about how I got the data, and put it in context.

US tight oil by play EIA AEO2014 forecasts.png

Data set downloads

To download these data sets as xlsx files, follow the links below to the xlsx pages, then click the button “RAW.”

1. tight oil production projections from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2014 [not previously published]: csv file and xlsx file.

2. tight oil production projections from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2013 (published in that report): csv file and xlsx file.

3. EIA’s historical tight oil production data, through May 2014 [not previously published]: csv file and xlsx file.

EIA’s tight oil projections

In their 2014 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), EIA's reference case projection showed tight oil production continuing to rise for only a few more years, then staying on a plateau for a few years, and finally entering a slow decline. If correct, this would mean the U.S. oil boom would soon end—or, it would mean the transition of tight oil production, from a boom phase of rapidly rising production to a mature phase of steady and then falling production.

2014 EIA AEO (early) Fig 1 - US liquid fuels by source 1970-2040.png

Figure 1 from EIA’s AEO 2014 (early release).

That 2014 projection for tight oil, and for total oil production, was considerably higher than the tight oil projections in their earlier AEOs.

US tight oil forecasts (EIA AEO 2012-2014).png

So naturally I was curious to find out what that higher projection in 2014 was based on. Their 2013 annual report had shown a breakdown like this, with the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Permian (which is actually a collection of different plays), and an “other” category.

2013 EIA AEO tight oil by play 2008-2040.png

EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2013, Figure 97.

The 2014 annual report didn’t show any breakdown like this for all the individual plays. But it did show a projection for Eagle Ford—so I figured they’d continued making projections for other plays. I got a hold of one of their analysts to ask—and it turned out they had made even more detailed projections than I expected, covering more than ten different plays. They sent me the year-by-year data points out to 2040—which also included historical data for each play back to 2000.

I think everyone should have easy access to this data—both historical and projected—so I’ve posted them on Github (links above). A new report out today, “Drilling Deeper,” compares these same EIA projections against his own. (I’ll write more about Hughes’ report in later posts.)

EIA’s historical tight oil data

It’s not easy to get a hold of good historical data on the individual plays—that is, without having a subscription to an expensive database like DrillingInfo. The EIA does show historical production by play for natural gas from shale plays (although as I pointed out in an earlier post, “The original shale gas field is tanking,” the recent months of data may be only estimates—and may get revised).

For whatever reason, they don’t provide data on tight oil by play. But in presentations and in posts in their “Today in Energy” series, they do sometimes show graphs of the production by play, like this:

US shale and tight oil through early 2014 by play (Sieminski slides).png

Historical data on tight oil production by play, from September 2014 presentation by EIA executive director Adam Sieminski. The slides noted: “Sources: EIA derived from state administrative data collected by DrillingInfo Inc. Data are through July 2014 and represent EIA’s official tight oil & shale gas estimates, but are not survey data. State abbreviations indicate primary state(s).”

Every month I gather the latest numbers of production of shale gas by play, from EIA’s Natural Gas Weekly Update. In June, when I downloaded the latest data set, I was initially confused. It was listing a different set of plays than usual. I realized it was actually the data for tight oil production by play. They’d accidentally posted the wrong data set, and soon after fixed that. But that gave me monthly production numbers from Jan 2000 to May 2014—a great collection of data to have. The link to that set is above as well.

For what it’s worth, this historical data for each play closely matches the historical portion of the AEO 2014 data I got from EIA.