X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-153-22924

Well Details

Well ID: 34-153-22924
Loading map...
County:
Municipality:
Operator Name:
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 2002-10-28
Unconventional:
Horizontal:
Producing: No
Violations: 2
Latitude: 41.1673968958
Longitude: -81.6288607516

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
-1702371642 2003-01-08 November 18, 2002 - The subject site was inspected for the purpose of determining the distance between the tank battery under construction and a vacant house south of the tank battery. The inspection was prompted by a spacing question posed to me by the Bath Township Zoning office. A roustabout crew was on site at the time of this inspection and assisted in measuring the distance between the house and the nearest stock tank. The measured distance was 83 feet and the crew was informed of the minimum distance requirements, including 100 feet between an occupied dwelling and a stock tank. Mr. Cal Marks with Transcontinental was notified of the problem by phone. Several possible locations were discussed and I reminded him of the minimum spacing requirements before leaving the site. A NOV was not issued since the tank battery was not operational.

December 3, 2002 - I was informed that the tank battery was relocated south of house and that it met all spacing requirements. January 8, 2003 - The site was inspected and I was told by the same roustabout crew that the tanks were 108 feet from the house and 70 feet from the wellhead. The site has been rough graded and the pits have been solidified. The secondary containment dike has been constructed around the tank battery. The well will be turned on in the very near future. No violations at this time.

-1979277888 2004-02-18 A status check inspection found that the tank battery equipment did not have the required distance between the separators and the tanks. The required distance between separator and tank is ten feet, the actual is less than three feet. Common tank battery with the O'Neill 2-D P/N 2925. 9-9-05(A)5
1037154788 2002-11-04 Status check inspection after the drilling was completed. Landogs Rig #1 completed the 1-D well and was being moved 100 feet north to spud the 2-D well. No violations at the 1-D site. The suction pit fluids will be transferred to the 2-D pits once they are lined.
1079038172 2004-03-10 The two 210 bbl stock tanks have been labeled, one brine and the other stock with the stock tank being over 10 feet from the nearest separator. The violation is corrected. 9-9-05(A)5
1740218041 2002-11-18 The drilling rig has moved off and the pits are being pumped out and solidified.