X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-073-21652"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-073-21652
 
| Well ID: 34-073-21652
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 39.5265465605, -82.3365332723 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 39.52666187, -82.33623571 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Hocking County, Ohio|Hocking]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[SINKOVITZ PAUL]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Spud Date:
+
| Spud Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Producing
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 14
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 39.5265465605
+
| Latitude: 39.52666187
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -82.3365332723
+
| Longitude: -82.33623571
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 1993-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 306.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 67.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1997-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 71.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1998-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 37.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1999-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 69.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2000-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 39.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2001-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 33.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2002-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 103.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 71.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2005-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 144.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2006-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 135.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2007-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 50.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 45.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 175:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1067932367
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2004-01-14
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, still wrong ID on well and tank battery.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Field Visit or Inspection
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1129549472
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2006-08-18
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Paul Sinkovitz, on 8/18/2006.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike needs to be pumped and housekeeping conducted around the well.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONEH
+
|  
−
|
+
| Compliance Notice
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1129549472
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2006-08-18
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Paul Sinkovitz, on 8/18/2006.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike needs to be pumped and housekeeping conducted around the well.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONEI
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1224312022
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2003-03-18
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| Follow-up on NOV, In-Compliance.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Compliance Notice
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1487223261
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2004-05-11
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| In-Compliance.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Field Visit or Inspection
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1533616995
+
| 1067853436
 
| 2007-03-13
 
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection revealed well that violations have not been resolved.  Mr. Paul Sinkovitz was again informed to resolve violations.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Compliance Notice
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1611224825
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2014-05-12
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| Upon inspection, it was observed that no effort has been made by the operator to bring this well location into compliance. There is still pollution and contamination around the well head from the operation of the leaking stuffing box. No changes have been made since the last inspection of this well on 3/21/2013.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Field Visit or Inspection
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1718043394
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2009-05-15
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| A follow-up inspection was conducted with the well owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  During the inspection, it was noted that a rubber line that allows the placement of brine back into well has been cut at the well.  It was noted however, lines are still attached to the tank and plug has not been placed inside the line.  Informed Mr. Sinkovitz that management with DMRM had wanted a plug to be placed inside the water lines.  Mr. Sinkovitz responded by stating that the line will not leak because the valve has been closed.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Field Visit or Inspection
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -1855131558
+
| 1067853436
−
| 2003-11-14
+
| 2007-03-13
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection of the well revealed ID at the well not correct, does not have Woodyard as owner, lease name wrong, Permit # wrong, have not received production records on this well for several years.
+
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-9-05(A)10
+
|  
−
|
+
| Compliance Notice
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -243572781
+
| -1067932367
−
| 2009-04-23
+
| 2004-01-14
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  It was noted that the earthen dike around the well head contained brine.  Mr. Stonerock utilized High Range Quantabs and verified that chlorides exceed 250 mg/l.  Mr. Stonerock informed Mr. Sinkovitz that he could place brine back into the tank.  Mr. Sinkovitz was also informed that Mr. Brent Bear would be conducting a follow-up inspection.  Note:  Production water is being placed back down the well.  The UIC section will be contacted regarding this inspection.
+
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, still wrong ID on well and tank battery.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-1-07
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -243572781
+
| -1129549472
−
| 2009-04-23
+
| 2006-08-18
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.   It was noted that the earthen dike around the well head contained brine.  Mr. Stonerock utilized High Range Quantabs and verified that chlorides exceed 250 mg/l.  Mr. Stonerock informed Mr. Sinkovitz that he could place brine back into the tank.  Mr. Sinkovitz was also informed that Mr. Brent Bear would be conducting a follow-up inspection.  Note:  Production water is being placed back down the well.  The UIC section will be contacted regarding this inspection.
+
| An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Paul Sinkovitz, on 8/18/2006. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike needs to be pumped and housekeeping conducted around the well.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONEI
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| -610037065
+
| -1224312022
−
| 2009-04-23
+
| 2003-03-18
−
|
+
|  
−
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  It was noted that Mr. Paul Sinkovitz is placing brine back back through the casing into the well bore.  Mr. Sinkovitz stated that he floats the oil out, which also alllows for him to continuously pump his well.  Mr. Tom Tomastik, Geologist, Technical Support Services Section and Mr. Jeff Fry, UIC Field Supervisor were then contacted and stated that this operation is considered to be illegal saltwater injection.  On 5/1/2009, an inspection conducted by Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry confirmed illegal saltwater injection  Both Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry informed Mr. Sinkovitz, in the field, to disconnect lines to the well for this operation.
+
| Follow-up on NOV, In-Compliance.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-3-12(A)B
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -610037065
 
−
| 2009-04-23
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  It was noted that Mr. Paul Sinkovitz is placing brine back back through the casing into the well bore.  Mr. Sinkovitz stated that he floats the oil out, which also alllows for him to continuously pump his well.  Mr. Tom Tomastik, Geologist, Technical Support Services Section and Mr. Jeff Fry, UIC Field Supervisor were then contacted and stated that this operation is considered to be illegal saltwater injection.  On 5/1/2009, an inspection conducted by Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry confirmed illegal saltwater injection  Both Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry informed Mr. Sinkovitz, in the field, to disconnect lines to the well for this operation.
 
−
|
 
−
| NONEM
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1067853436
 
−
| 2007-03-13
 
−
|
 
−
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved.  During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements.  Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike.  Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would  have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery.  The area of concern for this tank battery is the  flat terrain leading to a steep slope.  There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event.  Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge.  Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill.  Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine.  The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1269i1447
 
| 1269i1447
 
| 2002-10-15
 
| 2002-10-15
−
|
+
|  
 
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV. Violations have not been corrected.
 
| Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV. Violations have not been corrected.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 134472643
 
| 134472643
 
| 2002-09-05
 
| 2002-09-05
−
|
+
|  
 
| An inspection of the well site revealed no ID at the well head or tank battery, oily soil and oily gravel around the well head, flow line leaking in several places along lease rd.,no dike around production tanks.  NEED FULL ID AT THE WELL HEAD, CLEAN UP ALL OILY SOIL AND OILY GRAVEL AROUND WELL HEAD, REPAIR OR REPLACE LEAKING FLOW LINE,BUILD A DIKE AROUND THE PRODUCTION TANK TO MEET S.P.C.C. REQUIREMENTS.
 
| An inspection of the well site revealed no ID at the well head or tank battery, oily soil and oily gravel around the well head, flow line leaking in several places along lease rd.,no dike around production tanks.  NEED FULL ID AT THE WELL HEAD, CLEAN UP ALL OILY SOIL AND OILY GRAVEL AROUND WELL HEAD, REPAIR OR REPLACE LEAKING FLOW LINE,BUILD A DIKE AROUND THE PRODUCTION TANK TO MEET S.P.C.C. REQUIREMENTS.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1440801381
 
| 1440801381
 
| 2006-11-09
 
| 2006-11-09
−
|
+
|  
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violations have not been resolved.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, was verbally instructed to resolve this NOV.
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violations have not been resolved.  The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, was verbally instructed to resolve this NOV.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| -1487223261
−
| 2013-03-21
+
| 2004-05-11
−
|
+
|
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| In-Compliance.
−
|
+
|
−
| 9-1-03C
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1533616995
 +
| 2007-03-13
 +
|  
 +
| An inspection revealed well that violations have not been resolved.  Mr. Paul Sinkovitz was again informed to resolve violations.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| -1611224825
−
| 2013-03-21
+
| 2014-05-12
−
|
+
|  
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well. It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| Upon inspection, it was observed that no effort has been made by the operator to bring this well location into compliance. There is still pollution and contamination around the well head from the operation of the leaking stuffing box. No changes have been made since the last inspection of this well on 3/21/2013.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-1-07
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1694640905
 
| 1694640905
 
| 2013-03-21
 
| 2013-03-21
−
|
+
|  
 
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
 
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-9-05(A)10
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| -1718043394
−
| 2013-03-21
+
| 2009-05-15
−
|
+
|  
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill. Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| A follow-up inspection was conducted with the well owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  During the inspection, it was noted that a rubber line that allows the placement of brine back into well has been cut at the well.  It was noted however, lines are still attached to the tank and plug has not been placed inside the line.  Informed Mr. Sinkovitz that management with DMRM had wanted a plug to be placed inside the water lines.  Mr. Sinkovitz responded by stating that the line will not leak because the valve has been closed.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-9-05(A)2
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| -1855131558
−
| 2013-03-21
+
| 2003-11-14
−
|
+
|  
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| An inspection of the well revealed ID at the well not correct, does not have Woodyard as owner, lease name wrong, Permit # wrong, have not received production records on this well for several years.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONE(1)
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| 1904959589
 
| 2013-03-21
 
| 2013-03-21
−
|
+
|  
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| FOLLOW UP TO NOV #  1694640905 Well is equipped and capable of production.  The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft.  The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill.  Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft.  Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONE[C]
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1694640905
+
| -243572781
−
| 2013-03-21
+
| 2009-04-23
−
|
+
|  
−
| Well is equipped and capable of production. The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used.  There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike.  Tank battery is too close to the well.  It is less than 30 ft. The lease road for this well needs graded.  There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it.  Production has not been submitted for the year 2011.  All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus.  All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill. Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head.  The minimum requirement is 50 ft. Production records need submitted for this well.  Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
+
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.   It was noted that the earthen dike around the well head contained brine.  Mr. Stonerock utilized High Range Quantabs and verified that chlorides exceed 250 mg/l.  Mr. Stonerock informed Mr. Sinkovitz that he could place brine back into the tank.  Mr. Sinkovitz was also informed that Mr. Brent Bear would be conducting a follow-up inspection.  Note: Production water is being placed back down the well.  The UIC section will be contacted regarding this inspection.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONEC
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 52698370
 
| 52698370
 
| 2007-04-24
 
| 2007-04-24
−
|
+
|  
 
| The previously noted violations have been resolved.
 
| The previously noted violations have been resolved.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -610037065
 +
| 2009-04-23
 +
|
 +
| An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz.  It was noted that Mr. Paul Sinkovitz is placing brine back back through the casing into the well bore.  Mr. Sinkovitz stated that he floats the oil out, which also alllows for him to continuously pump his well.  Mr. Tom Tomastik, Geologist, Technical Support Services Section and Mr. Jeff Fry, UIC Field Supervisor were then contacted and stated that this operation is considered to be illegal saltwater injection.  On 5/1/2009, an inspection conducted by Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry confirmed illegal saltwater injection  Both Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry informed Mr. Sinkovitz, in the field, to disconnect lines to the well for this operation.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 10:05, 15 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-073-21652
Loading map...
County: Hocking
Municipality:
Operator Name: SINKOVITZ PAUL
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date:
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Producing
Violations: 0
Latitude: 39.52666187
Longitude: -82.33623571

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
1993-0 306.0 67.0
1997-0 0.0 71.0
1998-0 0.0 37.0
1999-0 0.0 69.0
2000-0 0.0 39.0
2001-0 0.0 33.0
2002-0 0.0 61.0
2003-0 0.0 103.0
2004-0 0.0 71.0
2005-0 0.0 144.0
2006-0 0.0 135.0
2007-0 0.0 50.0
2010-0 0.0 45.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Field Visit or Inspection
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Compliance Notice
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease.
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Compliance Notice
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Field Visit or Inspection
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Compliance Notice
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Field Visit or Inspection
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Field Visit or Inspection
1067853436 2007-03-13 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violation has not been resolved. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike for this tank battery does not meet SPCC requirements. Although work was performed on this dike, only a section located near the road was addressed. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, stated that he would not be doing any more work to this dike. Mr. Sinkovitz also stated that he has already spent enough money and would have to disconnect production lines to allow access to the remaining area surrounding the tank battery. The area of concern for this tank battery is the flat terrain leading to a steep slope. There is no dike to prevent a discharge from oil/gas related activity or from a rainfall event. Noted during all inspections was that the production area shows signs of brine discharge. Bare ground has been observed around production equipment and also over the hill. Mr. Sinkovitz was instructed after the initial inspection to seed and mulch area and to properly dispose brine. The dike still needs pumped and oily soil removed from the lease. Compliance Notice
-1067932367 2004-01-14 Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, still wrong ID on well and tank battery.
-1129549472 2006-08-18 An inspection was conducted at the facility owned by Paul Sinkovitz, on 8/18/2006. During the inspection, it was noted that the dike needs to be pumped and housekeeping conducted around the well.
-1224312022 2003-03-18 Follow-up on NOV, In-Compliance.
1269i1447 2002-10-15 Follow-up on NOV, Non-Compliance, company has not complied with NOV. Violations have not been corrected.
134472643 2002-09-05 An inspection of the well site revealed no ID at the well head or tank battery, oily soil and oily gravel around the well head, flow line leaking in several places along lease rd.,no dike around production tanks. NEED FULL ID AT THE WELL HEAD, CLEAN UP ALL OILY SOIL AND OILY GRAVEL AROUND WELL HEAD, REPAIR OR REPLACE LEAKING FLOW LINE,BUILD A DIKE AROUND THE PRODUCTION TANK TO MEET S.P.C.C. REQUIREMENTS.
1440801381 2006-11-09 A follow-up inspection revealed that the previously noted violations have not been resolved. The owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz, was verbally instructed to resolve this NOV.
-1487223261 2004-05-11 In-Compliance.
-1533616995 2007-03-13 An inspection revealed well that violations have not been resolved. Mr. Paul Sinkovitz was again informed to resolve violations.
-1611224825 2014-05-12 Upon inspection, it was observed that no effort has been made by the operator to bring this well location into compliance. There is still pollution and contamination around the well head from the operation of the leaking stuffing box. No changes have been made since the last inspection of this well on 3/21/2013.
1694640905 2013-03-21 Well is equipped and capable of production. The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used. There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike. Tank battery is too close to the well. It is less than 30 ft. The lease road for this well needs graded. There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it. Production has not been submitted for the year 2011. All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus. All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill. Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head. The minimum requirement is 50 ft. Production records need submitted for this well. Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
-1718043394 2009-05-15 A follow-up inspection was conducted with the well owner, Mr. Paul Sinkovitz. During the inspection, it was noted that a rubber line that allows the placement of brine back into well has been cut at the well. It was noted however, lines are still attached to the tank and plug has not been placed inside the line. Informed Mr. Sinkovitz that management with DMRM had wanted a plug to be placed inside the water lines. Mr. Sinkovitz responded by stating that the line will not leak because the valve has been closed.
-1855131558 2003-11-14 An inspection of the well revealed ID at the well not correct, does not have Woodyard as owner, lease name wrong, Permit # wrong, have not received production records on this well for several years.
1904959589 2013-03-21 FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1694640905 Well is equipped and capable of production. The well has an annular disposal connection that has been used. There are numerous buckets on site with fluid in them. The identification is incomplete. There is pollution and contamination around the well and in the tank dike. Tank battery is too close to the well. It is less than 30 ft. The lease road for this well needs graded. There are 1 to 1.5 ft. ruts in it. Production has not been submitted for the year 2011. All connections from the brine tank to the well need to be removed as well as the connection from the production tubing to the 4.5 in. annulus. All pollution and contaminated fluids and soils need removed from well site and disposed of at an EPA approved landfill. Complete identification needs posted at well head. Tank battery needs to be moved to an appropriate distance from the well head. The minimum requirement is 50 ft. Production records need submitted for this well. Failure to comply will result in forfeiture of bond. Accompanied by Southwest Region Supervisor Dan Goins.
-243572781 2009-04-23 An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz. It was noted that the earthen dike around the well head contained brine. Mr. Stonerock utilized High Range Quantabs and verified that chlorides exceed 250 mg/l. Mr. Stonerock informed Mr. Sinkovitz that he could place brine back into the tank. Mr. Sinkovitz was also informed that Mr. Brent Bear would be conducting a follow-up inspection. Note: Production water is being placed back down the well. The UIC section will be contacted regarding this inspection.
52698370 2007-04-24 The previously noted violations have been resolved.
-610037065 2009-04-23 An inspection was conducted with Oil & Gas Supervisor, Mr. Robert Stonerock and Mr. Paul Sinkovitz. It was noted that Mr. Paul Sinkovitz is placing brine back back through the casing into the well bore. Mr. Sinkovitz stated that he floats the oil out, which also alllows for him to continuously pump his well. Mr. Tom Tomastik, Geologist, Technical Support Services Section and Mr. Jeff Fry, UIC Field Supervisor were then contacted and stated that this operation is considered to be illegal saltwater injection. On 5/1/2009, an inspection conducted by Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry confirmed illegal saltwater injection Both Mr. Stonerock and Mr. Fry informed Mr. Sinkovitz, in the field, to disconnect lines to the well for this operation.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://www.wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-073-21652&oldid=4069219"