X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-153-22924"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-153-22924
 
| Well ID: 34-153-22924
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.1673968958, -81.6288607516 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.1673969, -81.62886075 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Summit County, Ohio|Summit]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[TRANSCONTINENTAL O & G]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 2002-10-28
 
| Spud Date: 2002-10-28
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Producing
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 2
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 41.1673968958
+
| Latitude: 41.1673969
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -81.6288607516
+
| Longitude: -81.62886075
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 9907.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1859.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 12911.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 986.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2005-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6808.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 648.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2006-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 5195.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 393.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2007-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3748.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 364.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2008-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3369.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 224.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2009-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2787.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 202.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 5154.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 440.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6577.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 387.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 5343.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 347.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3320.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 218.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2980.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 169.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 166:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
−
|-
 
−
| -1702371642
 
−
| 2003-01-08
 
−
|
 
−
| November 18, 2002 - The subject site was inspected for the purpose of determining the distance between the tank battery under construction and a vacant house south of the tank battery. The inspection was prompted by a spacing question posed to me by the Bath Township Zoning office. A roustabout crew was on site at the time of this inspection and assisted in measuring the distance between the house and the nearest stock tank. The measured distance was 83 feet and the crew was informed of the minimum distance requirements, including 100 feet between an occupied dwelling and a stock tank. Mr. Cal Marks with Transcontinental was notified of the problem by phone. Several possible locations were discussed and I reminded him of the minimum spacing requirements before leaving the site. A NOV was not issued since the tank battery was not operational.
 
−
December 3, 2002 - I was informed that the tank battery was relocated south of house and that it met all spacing requirements.
 
−
January 8, 2003 - The site was inspected and I was told by the same roustabout crew that the tanks were 108 feet from the house and 70 feet from the wellhead. The site has been rough graded and the pits have been solidified. The secondary containment dike has been constructed around the tank battery. The well will be turned on in the very near future. No violations at this time.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -1979277888
 
−
| 2004-02-18
 
−
|
 
−
| A status check inspection found that the tank battery equipment did not have the required distance between the separators and the tanks. The required distance between separator and tank is ten feet, the actual is less than three feet. Common tank battery with the O'Neill 2-D P/N 2925.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)5
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1037154788
 
| 1037154788
 
| 2002-11-04
 
| 2002-11-04
−
|
+
|  
 
| Status check inspection after the drilling was completed. Landogs Rig #1 completed the 1-D well and was being moved 100 feet north to spud the 2-D well. No violations at the 1-D site. The suction pit fluids will be transferred to the 2-D pits once they are lined.
 
| Status check inspection after the drilling was completed. Landogs Rig #1 completed the 1-D well and was being moved 100 feet north to spud the 2-D well. No violations at the 1-D site. The suction pit fluids will be transferred to the 2-D pits once they are lined.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Compliance Notice
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1079038172
 
| 1079038172
 
| 2004-03-10
 
| 2004-03-10
−
|
+
|  
 
| The two 210 bbl stock tanks have been labeled, one brine and the other stock with the stock tank being over 10 feet from the nearest separator. The violation is corrected.
 
| The two 210 bbl stock tanks have been labeled, one brine and the other stock with the stock tank being over 10 feet from the nearest separator. The violation is corrected.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-9-05(A)5
+
|  
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1702371642
 +
| 2003-01-08
 +
|
 +
| November 18, 2002 - The subject site was inspected for the purpose of determining the distance between the tank battery under construction and a vacant house south of the tank battery. The inspection was prompted by a spacing question posed to me by the Bath Township Zoning office. A roustabout crew was on site at the time of this inspection and assisted in measuring the distance between the house and the nearest stock tank. The measured distance was 83 feet and the crew was informed of the minimum distance requirements, including 100 feet between an occupied dwelling and a stock tank. Mr. Cal Marks with Transcontinental was notified of the problem by phone. Several possible locations were discussed and I reminded him of the minimum spacing requirements before leaving the site. A NOV was not issued since the tank battery was not operational.
 +
December 3, 2002 - I was informed that the tank battery was relocated south of house and that it met all spacing requirements.
 +
January 8, 2003 - The site was inspected and I was told by the same roustabout crew that the tanks were 108 feet from the house and 70 feet from the wellhead. The site has been rough graded and the pits have been solidified. The secondary containment dike has been constructed around the tank battery. The well will be turned on in the very near future. No violations at this time.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1740218041
 
| 1740218041
 
| 2002-11-18
 
| 2002-11-18
−
|
+
|  
 
| The drilling rig has moved off and the pits are being pumped out and solidified.
 
| The drilling rig has moved off and the pits are being pumped out and solidified.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1979277888
 +
| 2004-02-18
 +
|
 +
| A status check inspection found that the tank battery equipment did not have the required distance between the separators and the tanks. The required distance between separator and tank is ten feet, the actual is less than three feet. Common tank battery with the O'Neill 2-D P/N 2925.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 10:15, 15 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-153-22924
Loading map...
County: Summit
Municipality:
Operator Name: TRANSCONTINENTAL O & G
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 2002-10-28
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Producing
Violations: 0
Latitude: 41.1673969
Longitude: -81.62886075

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2003-0 9907.0 1859.0
2004-0 12911.0 986.0
2005-0 6808.0 648.0
2006-0 5195.0 393.0
2007-0 3748.0 364.0
2008-0 3369.0 224.0
2009-0 2787.0 202.0
2010-0 5154.0 440.0
2011-0 6577.0 387.0
2012-0 5343.0 347.0
2013-0 3320.0 218.0
2014-0 2980.0 365.0 169.0 365.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
1037154788 2002-11-04 Status check inspection after the drilling was completed. Landogs Rig #1 completed the 1-D well and was being moved 100 feet north to spud the 2-D well. No violations at the 1-D site. The suction pit fluids will be transferred to the 2-D pits once they are lined. Compliance Notice
1079038172 2004-03-10 The two 210 bbl stock tanks have been labeled, one brine and the other stock with the stock tank being over 10 feet from the nearest separator. The violation is corrected.
-1702371642 2003-01-08 November 18, 2002 - The subject site was inspected for the purpose of determining the distance between the tank battery under construction and a vacant house south of the tank battery. The inspection was prompted by a spacing question posed to me by the Bath Township Zoning office. A roustabout crew was on site at the time of this inspection and assisted in measuring the distance between the house and the nearest stock tank. The measured distance was 83 feet and the crew was informed of the minimum distance requirements, including 100 feet between an occupied dwelling and a stock tank. Mr. Cal Marks with Transcontinental was notified of the problem by phone. Several possible locations were discussed and I reminded him of the minimum spacing requirements before leaving the site. A NOV was not issued since the tank battery was not operational.

December 3, 2002 - I was informed that the tank battery was relocated south of house and that it met all spacing requirements. January 8, 2003 - The site was inspected and I was told by the same roustabout crew that the tanks were 108 feet from the house and 70 feet from the wellhead. The site has been rough graded and the pits have been solidified. The secondary containment dike has been constructed around the tank battery. The well will be turned on in the very near future. No violations at this time.

1740218041 2002-11-18 The drilling rig has moved off and the pits are being pumped out and solidified.
-1979277888 2004-02-18 A status check inspection found that the tank battery equipment did not have the required distance between the separators and the tanks. The required distance between separator and tank is ten feet, the actual is less than three feet. Common tank battery with the O'Neill 2-D P/N 2925.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://www.wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-153-22924&oldid=4070911"