X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-031-25379

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-25379
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: Monroe Township
Operator Name: MFC DRILLING INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: GAMERTSFELDER GORDON R& REVA J
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1984-06-25
Spud Date: 1984-07-25
Spud Drilling Contractor: LBJ DRILLING
Final Drill Date: 1984-07-31
Well Total Depth: 3767.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.380000
Longitude: -82.000000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
Oil and Gas 1984-06-25 Issued Date 6/25/84 Expired Date 12/22/84 Acres 0020000 Tool Type RTAF Proposed Formation CLINTON Proposed Depth 03767 Proposed Drill Depth 03767
Original Spud 1984-07-25
Completed 1984-07-31
Reached Total Depth 1984-07-31
CO 1984-08-10 226 LBJ DRILLING CO INC GeoDate 6/25/84
Completion Report Received 1984-09-04
Construction Permit Expires 1984-12-22
Change of Owner 2005-11-10 Operator changed from 226, LBJ DRILLING CO INC to 3059, MFC DRILLING INC
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
1997-06-29 3592 3646 16
3592 3646 16
3592 3646 16

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
0 0 0 FRAC: H2O,SAND

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 3745.00 192.00 0
1985 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 7200.00 273.00 365
1986 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 797.00 194.00 365
1989 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 993.00 113.00 365
1990 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 845.00 112.00 365
1991 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 592.00 122.00 365
1994 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 0.00 80.00 365
1997 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 0.00 139.00 365
2002 LBJ DRILLING CO INC 0.00 148.00 365
2005 MFC DRILLING INC 0.00 0.00 365
2006 MFC DRILLING INC 794.00 217.00 365
2007 MFC DRILLING INC 136.00 73.00 365
2008 MFC DRILLING INC 265.00 136.00 365
2009 MFC DRILLING INC 370.00 66.00 365
2010 MFC DRILLING INC 314.00 143.00 365
2011 MFC DRILLING INC 106.00 147.00 365
2012 MFC DRILLING INC 100.00 0.00 366
2013 MFC DRILLING INC 122.00 145.00 365
2014 MFC DRILLING INC 176.00 142.00 365
2015 MFC DRILLING INC 161.00 75.00 365
2016 MFC DRILLING INC 169.00 157.00 365
2017 MFC DRILLING INC 174.00 76.00 365
2018 MFC DRILLING INC 69.00 95.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 0
1985 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
1986 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
1989 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
1990 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
1991 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
1994 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 5 365
1997 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 25 365
2002 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
2005 LBJ DRILLING CO INC Brine 0 365
2006 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 20 365
2007 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 80 365
2008 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 32 365
2009 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 92 365
2010 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2011 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 27 365
2012 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 366
2013 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2014 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2015 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2016 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2017 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365
2018 MFC DRILLING INC Brine 0 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1409254821 2002-9-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations
-1485472620 2017-11-8 0:00: PW No Violations 0.40
-1513024807 2018-1-11 0:00: PW No Violations 1.30
-2060787365 2017-6-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations 1.00
-21305525 2017-6-21 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
-654621152 2017-7-17 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-667693352 2017-5-16 0:00: PW No Violations 1.50
-75257505 2017-7-26 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
-852749407 2017-7-18 0:00: PW No Violations 1.50
-909693599 2017-8-25 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
001252i377 2002-09-09 Production Wells Violations Noted arrived on location for complaint of venting gas at wellhead;talked with company will reset pressure on tank
0021305525 2017-06-21 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I visited the site with SE Regional and District Supervisors Brent Bear and Mike Moreland, and Emergency Operations Coordinator Jason Blocker. I found that the there was still free crude oil seeping out of the roadside embankment and pooling at the head of the culvert. Jason found oil dripping out of the lower end of the culvert. The hole where MFC had removed the contaminated soil from under the tank was partially filled with water. I did not find any signs of oil floating in the water, but there were still areas of dark staining in the soil inside of the excavated dike. The treated, stockpiled soil within the earthen berm appeared to have been turned since my last inspection. I found reddish-
0075257505 2017-07-26 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the roadside embankment was still seeping crude oil. The volume was visibly greater than on my previous inspection. There was a pool of crude oil that had collected against the absorbent boom in the culvert head. The second boom was still in place in the lower field and there was some oily residue that had collected against it. I did not find any crude oil beyond the boom. There was not any straw down yet. I did not observe any grass seed, it either washed away in the recent rains or settled into the soil. I called MFC, per direction from the Environmental Section, to ask that they put straw down. I also suggested that they look into more excavation on the roadside embankment.
0507172262 2017-08-17 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the straw bails and boom at the base of the roadside embankment was clean. I did not find any more oil seeping from the exposed soil. The lower field was still 90% bare, with very minimal grass growth on the perimeter. I called MFC Drilling and spoke with Jim Aslinides about re-seeding the area and putting straw down to foster growth. He said that they would get something done.
0654621152 2017-07-17 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the absorbent booms were still in place at the head of the culvert. There was more oil seeping out of the hillside and collecting at the booms. No pads or boom had been installed in the lower field. I called MFC to get the pumpers phone number. I then called the pumper, Dustin Stainer and left a message stating that I wish to meet him at the site in order to get more pads and a boom placed in the field. Dustin returned my call and agreed to meet at the site first thing tomorrow morning.
0667693352 2017-05-16 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with DOGRM Emergency Operations Supervisor Trisha Cartmell to look at the clean-up. Coshocton Pipeline had all of the booms out of the creek. We did not find any signs of crude oil skim or sheen. They had the ditch from the field tile removal covered up and the soil in the field had been treated with lime, fertilizer and BioSorb. The crew had the 100 barrel steel tank along TR 32 removed and they were excavating the oil contaminated soil that was under that tank. They were taking the soil down to the lower field and treating it to be bio-remediated on site. Nick Hahn said that they had to remove 35 tons of soil from under the tank because oil had gotten into the groundhog hole when the tank overflowed.
0852749407 2017-07-18 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with the well pumper Dustin Stainer. He had absorbent booms and pads with him. I showed him the pool in the diversion ditch where I wanted them placed. Coshocton Pipeline was also on location turning and grading the remediated soil. They brought in a load of new topsoil to mix in with the existing. Dustin said that they intended to seed the site today once it was completely graded out. I also spoke with Dustin about the oil seeping out of the hillside by the upper culvert head. He agreed to keep absorbent materials at the culvert, and to monitor and change them as needed.
0867552693 2017-08-07 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the roadside embankment had been dug out and three bails of straw placed at the base. I only found one small oil seep from the side of the embankment, and I found no oil collecting in the culvert ditch. An absorbent boom had been placed against the straw bails and pads had been placed in the culvert ditch. The boom was still in place in the diversion ditch in the lower field. The remediation site in the lower field had not been covered in straw.
0909693599 2017-08-25 Production Wells No Violations
0979046199 2017-10-20 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the lower field where the oil impacted soil was bio-remediated and spread was approximately 80% covered in grass growth. There were no signs of residual oil in the soil or the perimeter of the site. The roadside ditch and embankment was still free of oil. The only area of the lower field that wasnt covered in short grass or tall weeds was very center of the site and a pair of tractor tracks leasing up to the site.
1059151299 2003-07-25 Production Wells No Violations Well head not venting gas , compliance
1252i377 2002-9-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations
1371468215 2017-09-19 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I accompanied DOGRM Emergency Response Supervisor Trisha Cartmell to the site to do a follow up on the remediation. The dug out dike where the original tank overflow took place was dry, and there were no signs of residual oil contamination in the soil. The roadside embankment below the dike was also free of oil contamination. The straw bails, absorbent boom and pads were still in place. There were no signs of oil residue in the drainage ditch and culvert head. The bio-remediation site in the lower field had been roughed up, seeded and covered in straw. No vegetative growth had started yet. This site will require continued monitoring.
1409254821 2002-09-09 Production Wells Violations Noted FOLLOW UP TO NOV # 1252i377 arrived on location for complaint of venting gas at well head , talked with company , will reset pressure on tank.
1485472620 2017-11-08 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the old dike area and the roadside embankment below the dike were still free of crude oil. The straw bails and boom were still in place, but they were clean. The lower field where the contaminated soil was treated for bio-remediation was completely covered with well established grass. There were no signs of residual contamination or erosion. I am resolving the compliance notice at this time.
1495045412 2017-05-13 Production Wells Violations Noted I received a phone call from Jim Aslanides of MFC Drilling on Friday, May 12 at 22:12 to report an oil release. I discovered the message at 23:44 and returned the call. Jim said that they had a tank overflow and they lost approximately 15 to 20 barrels of crude oil. He said that the oil had gotten into a culvert and into an agricultural field across the road. He said that no oil had gotten into the stream. I called the DOGRM Emergency Response number to report the issue at 23:56 and spoke with the duty officer Scott King, who confirmed that he had already been notified by MFC Drilling. Jim called back at 00:17 to report that the oil had gotten into a field tile and into the stream. I advised Jim to call the Ohio EPA spill hotline and I gave him the number for Trevor Irwin with the Ohio EPA.

I was contacted by Trevor Irwin at 07:06 on Saturday, May 13 to coordinate on the response. I arrived at the site at approximately 08:30 and found that Nick Hahn with Coshocton Pipeline was there working on containment. He had booms and pads in the stream and a sump dug at the end of the field tile to collect the trickling oil. The stream flow was rapid, and there was very little visible impact to the stream. The booms and pads were discolored, but there was no visible sheen. The only visible oil skim was that which had collected against the booms placed 900 feet east at a bridge on County Rd 49. I spot checked the stream for another 0.5 miles east and found no evidence of crude oil. Most of the oil was on the surface in the field and covered with BioSorb. The main production tanks were on the top of a hill to the north, and they are shared by permits 5378 and 5379. Nick said that they have approximately 1500 feet of steel line that runs from tanks at the top of the hill to a 100 barrel steel tank along the north side of Twp. Rd 32, where the fluid is picked up. I was told that the valve was not properly shut at the upper tank, which allowed the oil to flow unchecked to the b

1495207827 2017-05-15 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with DOGRM Environmental Assessment Coordinator, Joshua Schiering to look at the clean-up. There was still a small amount of crude oil skim that was collected at the boom in the creek at the bridge on CR 49. Coshocton Pipeline had the field tile removed and they had been flushing the tile ditch with fresh water to the sump. The tile ditch was partially covered with soil. The creek bank was clean of crude oil, and they had booms/pads along the stream bank to collect any residual oil. The crew was working to mix lime, fertilizer and BioSorb into the soil that had been affected by crude oil. Nick Hahn said that they had spoken with the landowners and they had agreed to bio-remediation in place. Nick was working to remove all of the impacted soil from the embankment under the culvert. They were making progress on the clean-up.
1507315541 2017-10-06 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that there was some more grass growth around the perimeters of the remediated soil area. The center was still bare. Yesterday and today was the first significant rainfall in this area for 12 to 14 days. I will check back next week.
1513024807 2018-01-11 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the area where the oil impacted soil had been bio-remediated was completely covered in short grasses. There has been heavy snow and rainfall in this area and I found no signs of residual crude oil in the remediated area. The roadside embankment where the oil had been released was also free of any signs of residual crude oil. The straw bails and absorbent boom were still in place, and the bare soil was clean. The original dike for the tank that had run over was still open and the tank was still positioned up hill. There was no crude oil in the dike and I found none in the roadside ditch.
1700749181 2017-09-08 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the dike where the leak originally occurred was almost dry. There was some water pooled in the bottom that was green with algae. The roadside embankment was dry and I did not find any oil seepage. The straw bail was still clean and I did not find any oil pooled in the ditch at the culvert head. The lower field where the contaminated soil was treated and spread for bio-remediation was still bare. No grass was growing, there were no signs that new grass seed had been spread on the site, and there was no straw spread. I called and left a message with Jim Aslinides recommending that they rough the soil up, and then re-seed and straw the area.
1872165115 2017-07-14 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that an absorbent boom had been installed in the head of the culvert. I did not see any oil absorbent materials in the lower field.
1952738935 2017-09-28 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that grass growth was starting on one end of the remediated soil. It was the end farthest from where the actual contaminated soil was treated. The growth only covered 15% to 20% of the affected area. The rest was still completely bare.
1970854676 2017-07-13 Production Wells No Violations On 5/13/17, the date of my initial inspection, I informed Nick Hahn that they must get landowner permission to bio-remediate in place. During my follow up inspection on 5/15/17 Nick Hahn claimed that they had spoken with Mr. Lowe and they had permission to bio-remediate the oil impacted soil in the lower field. On the day of my inspection I met with Mr. and Mrs. Lowe, who are the landowners of the small field where the bio-remediation is taking place. They both said that they were never approached by anyone to ask permission, and they never granted permission. They expressed concern about monetary restitution for lost crops, as they claimed that they typically grow sweet corn in that field. I walked the remediation site and found that the berm and stockpiled soil had been mixed and rough graded. The diversion ditch was still in place. The site was very wet due to recent rains. I found no signs of crude oil in the freshly disturbed soil. There was some crude oil collecting in a pool along the diversion ditch, but I did not find any indication that it was flowing into the nearby stream. The source of the oil appeared to be the upper roadside embankment below the original tank location. There was still a visible oil seepage from the hillside into the culvert. There were no pads or boom in place at the culvert or in the lower field. I called Jackie Wilkins at MFC to request that they get a boom staked in at the head of the culvert. I also requested that they get a boom and pads in the pool where the crude oil residue was collecting. She said that she would get the word to the appropriate field staff.
2060787365 2017-06-09 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the 100 barrel tank used to pick up fluid at TR 32 had not been re-set. The dike area was dug out and there was a pile of new gravel inside. There was still some oil staining in the soil on the side walls of the dike, and the slope leading down to the road. There was a large earthen containment dike, approximately 60 feet by 60 feet, constructed in the lower field. The soil in the dike had been mixed with lime, fertilizer and BioSorb for bio-remediation in place. The soil was dry and relatively clean with respect to oil staining. The berm of the dike was already covered in grass. There was one area outside of the dike where heavy oil staining was present. The stream bank was relatively dry and clean and I did not observe any signs of oil in the stream water. I called and left a message with Nick Hahn requesting that they get the oily soil dug up and mixed in with the treated soil within the containment berm.
2112447266 2017-07-19 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with Kyle Tharp and Shannon Mullins with the Environmental Assessment Section to look at the site. The soil had been final graded and covered in seed. There was no straw down and the site was dry. Another boom and some absorbent pads had been placed in the lower field. We did not find any oil getting into the creek. The hole where the 100 barrel tank used to sit was partially filled with water and there was still oil seeping from the hillside near the culvert. The booms were still in place at the culvert head.
507172262 2017-8-17 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
867552693 2017-8-7 0:00:0 PW No Violations 0.50
979046199 2017-10-20 0:00 PW No Violations

Violations Commited

Inspection ID Violation ID Violation Date Violation Code Violation Comments
001252i377 US-OH-106792 2002-10-15 Unlawful venting or flaring of gas
1409254821 US-OH-112056 2002-10-15 Unlawful venting or flaring of gas
1495045412 US-OH-113986 2017-12-29 Well operation causing pollution and contamination

For data sources see[9]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  9. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://www.wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-031-25379&oldid=14137177"