X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-21920

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-21920
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Bridgewater Township
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP
Well Pad ID: 152065
Farm/Lease Name: WRIGHT W 6
License Status: Active
Spud Date: 2015-02-16
Permit Date: 2014-11-19
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.788308
Longitude: -75.912533

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2014-11-19 New Permit Application
2015-02-16 Performed Spud Operation
2015-03-18 Drilling Completion
2016-08-12 Perforation
2016-08-12 Performed Stage 1 of Stimulation
2016-10-07 Perforation
2016-10-25 Perforation
2016-10-25 Performed Stage 2 of Stimulation
2016-10-25 Performed Stage 3 of Stimulation
2016-10-26 Perforation
2016-10-26 Performed Stage 4 of Stimulation
2016-10-26 Performed Stage 5 of Stimulation
2016-10-27 Perforation
2016-10-27 Performed Stage 6 of Stimulation
2016-10-27 Performed Stage 7 of Stimulation
2016-10-28 Perforation
2016-10-28 Performed Stage 8 of Stimulation
2016-10-28 Performed Stage 9 of Stimulation
2016-10-29 Perforation
2016-10-29 Performed Stage 10 of Stimulation
2016-10-30 Perforation
2016-10-30 Performed Stage 11 of Stimulation
2016-10-30 Performed Stage 12 of Stimulation
2016-10-31 Perforation
2016-10-31 Performed Stage 13 of Stimulation
2016-11-01 Perforation
2016-11-01 Performed Stage 14 of Stimulation
2016-11-02 Perforation
2016-11-02 Performed Stage 15 of Stimulation
2016-11-03 Perforation
2016-11-03 Performed Stage 16 of Stimulation
2016-11-04 Perforation
2016-11-04 Performed Stage 17 of Stimulation
2016-11-04 Performed Stage 18 of Stimulation
2016-11-05 Perforation
2016-11-05 Performed Stage 19 of Stimulation
2016-11-06 Perforation
2016-11-06 Performed Stage 20 of Stimulation
2016-11-07 Perforation
2016-11-07 Performed Stage 21 of Stimulation
2016-11-07 Performed Stage 22 of Stimulation
2016-11-08 Perforation
2016-11-08 Performed Stage 23 of Stimulation
2016-11-09 Perforation
2016-11-09 Performed Stage 24 of Stimulation
2016-11-09 Performed Stage 25 of Stimulation
2016-11-10 Perforation
2016-11-10 Performed Stage 26 of Stimulation
2016-11-10 Performed Stage 27 of Stimulation
2016-11-11 Perforation
2016-11-11 Performed Stage 28 of Stimulation
2016-11-11 Performed Stage 29 of Stimulation
2016-11-12 Perforation
2016-11-12 Performed Stage 30 of Stimulation
2016-11-12 Performed Stage 31 of Stimulation
2016-11-13 Perforation
2016-11-13 Performed Stage 32 of Stimulation
2017-01-31 Deviated

For data sources see[4]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 2016-10-24 2016-11-12 6,559 11,456,000 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Alpha 1427 Baker Hughes Biocide MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.022744 24578.8
Sand, White, 40/70 Baker Hughes Proppant MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 10.6726 11,533,600.0
Scaletrol 720, 330 gl tote Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0045999 4970.91
Other Chemical(s) Baker Hughes See Trade Name(s) List Water 7732-18-5 85 0.324067 350644
Water Operator Carrier Water 7732-18-5 100 88.2784 95,518,200.0
HCl, 10.1 - 15% Baker Hughes Acidizing MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.280021 302610
FRW-18 Baker Hughes Friction Reducer MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0200903 21711
Sand, White, 100 mesh Baker Hughes Proppant MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.598489 646769
Ferrotrol 300L (Totes) Baker Hughes Iron Control MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0019248 2080.11
Scaletrol 5279 Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0109237 11804.9
Fatty Acids 61790-12-3 10 0.00004420 47.85
Polyoxythylene Sorbitan Monooleate 9005-65-6 0.5 0.0001003 108.555
Calcium Chloride 10043-52-4 5 0.0002297 248.546
Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate 1338-43-8 5 0.0040447 4376.37
Ethanol 64-17-5 5 0.0011358 1228.94
1-Propanesulfonic acid 2-methyl-2[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino]monosodium
salt, polymer 2-propenamide
38193-60-1 30 0.024268 26258.2
Ethylene Glycol 107-21-1 45 0.0064314 6958.88
Crystalline Silica (Quartz) 14808-60-7 100 11.2571 12,180,300.0
Poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) partial sodium salt 62649-23-4 30 0.0060196 6513.31
Ammonium Chloride 12125-02-9 3 0.000602 651.331
Propargyl Alcohol 107-19-7 5 0.00002210 23.925
Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride 7173-51-5 10 0.0022716 2457.88
2-Propenoic, Polymer with Sodium Phosphinate, Sodium Salt 71050-62-9 20 0.0009188 994.182
Olefin 64743-02-8 5 0.00002210 23.925
Quaternary Ammonium Compound 68424-85-1 5 0.0011358 1228.94
Modified carboxylic acid salt Trade Secret 17 0.0018547 2006.84
Phosphonate Salt Trade Secret 2 0.0002182 236.099
Urea 57-13-6 5 0.0040447 4376.37
Methanol 67-56-1 100 0.0004422 478.5
Polyoxyalkylenes 68951-67-7 30 0.0001327 143.55
Hydrochloric Acid 7647-01-0 15 0.0419554 45396.3
2-Propenoic acid 2methylpolymer,2methyl-2[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino]1propanesulfonic
acid monosodium
136793-29-8 5 0.0040447 4376.37
Sodium Chloride 7647-14-5 5 0.0011583 1253.31
Citric Acid 77-92-9 60 0.0011535 1248.07
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 1 0.00000440 4.785
Sorbitan Monooleate 1338-43-8 0.5 0.0001003 108.555
Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated 68551-12-2 2 0.0004013 434.221
Modified Thiourea Polymer 68527-49-1 7 0.00003100 33.495
Glutaraldehyde 111-30-8 30 0.0068147 7373.63
Hydrotreated Light Distillate 64742-47-8 30 0.0060196 6513.31
Oleamide DEA 93-83-4 2 0.0004013 434.221
Sodium Bisulfite 7631-90-5 1 0.0001091 118.049
Sulfuric acid diammonium salt 7783-20-2 30 0.024268 26258.2
Potassium Chloride 7447-40-7 1 0.00004590 49.7091
CI-14 Baker Hughes Corrosion Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0004428 478.5

For data sources see[5]

Stimulation Data

Stimulation Date Phase Number Chemical Agent Volume (gal) Treating Pressure (psi) Breakdown Pressure (psi)
2016-08-12 1 SAND, WHITE 270,411 8,005 8,290
2016-10-25 2 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,914 7,007
2016-10-25 3 SAND, WHITE 270,411 8,030 7,353
2016-10-26 4 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,787 7,226
2016-10-26 5 SAND, WHITE 270,411 8,146 7,939
2016-10-27 6 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,917 7,622
2016-10-27 7 SAND, WHITE 270,411 8,000 6,218
2016-10-28 8 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,825 6,510
2016-10-28 9 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,913 7,605
2016-10-29 10 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,803 6,731
2016-10-30 11 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,630 6,665
2016-10-30 12 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,668 7,413
2016-10-31 13 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,682 7,060
2016-11-01 14 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,533 6,823
2016-11-02 15 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,505 6,162
2016-11-03 16 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,195 6,494
2016-11-04 17 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,286 7,292
2016-11-04 18 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,270 7,161
2016-11-05 19 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,350 7,128
2016-11-06 20 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,496 7,520
2016-11-07 21 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,414 7,466
2016-11-07 22 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,560 7,901
2016-11-08 23 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,918 5,383
2016-11-09 24 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,856 7,475
2016-11-09 25 SAND, WHITE 270,411 7,036 6,739
2016-11-10 26 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,473 8,314
2016-11-10 27 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,463 5,710
2016-11-11 28 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,843 9,321
2016-11-11 29 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,484 7,253
2016-11-12 30 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,933 8,340
2016-11-12 31 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,836 7,465
2016-11-13 32 SAND, WHITE 270,411 6,384 6,306

For data sources see[6]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 878,365.57 41 0.00 0 0.00 0
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 5,329,040.25 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 2,485,095.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 1,642,120.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Waste Type Quantity Disposal Method Waste Facility ID
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drilling Fluid Waste 36.67 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NC018
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drill Cuttings 1,621.88 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 48.83 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 11,870.88 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 568.88 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 99.19 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Other Oil & Gas Wastes 0.03 Tons RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY 301333
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Waste Water Treatment Sludge 20.37 Tons LANDFILL THR029
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 7.29 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 597.83 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 31.98 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE004
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 2,344.18 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 2.49 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 692.54 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 176.97 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 500.95 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002

For data sources see[8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2344124 Primary Facility 2015-02-13 Preoperation Inspection No Violations Noted
2347529 Primary Facility 2015-02-24 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted
2535825 Primary Facility 2016-11-10 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 9:10a.m., Baker Hughes was on site and fracking the 1H, 2H, and 6H. I met with company man Wayne Wilridge (Operations Manager). They were fracking stage 19 out of 28 on the 2H and running a plug and perforation in the 6H. The 1H was completed with 21 stages and 27 stages were completed out of 32 on the 6H. The water was being hauled to tanks on the lower pad and pumped to the well pad through a plastic line. The tanks were on containment and it was in good condition. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 10:40a.m.

2552783 Primary Facility 2017-01-17 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 11:20a.m., the well was recently completed and is in production. The well tag was on the well and correct. The cellar was full of water with no bubbling noticed, the (20x13) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (13x9) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. There was 762psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 11:55a.m.

2557872 Primary Facility 2017-01-26 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection of the Wright well site (ESX13-115-0131). The wells associated with this site are as follows:

115-21915 115-21916 115-21919 115-21920

The Department had previously been on site on January 18, 2017 and there was debris on site at that time. There were sandbags littering the site and there was very little growth on the fill slope of the tank pad (Photo 1). There apparently had been recent excavation work done at that time near the road entrance, and there was an expanse of unmulched/unstabilized ground (Photo 2). At the time, the Department decided to wait and see if the situation was just in limbo due to work having been completed for the day or weather conditions. On January 26, 2016, the Department returned to the site and found the previously noted conditions were the same. The exposed ground was not stabilized nor was any debris removed from the pad site. The fill slope was also not stabilized. It would be recommended that the fi

2600178 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2627479 Primary Facility 2017-08-21 Follow-up Inspection No Violations Noted I received an email from Mike Pirner of Cabot letting me know most repairs to the Wright well site were now completed. Upon inspection of the site I found that they were indeed completed and stability had been restored to the site previously affected by torrential rains. The entire area was now reseeded, limed, fertilized and mulched. The slopes were starting to green up where erosion blanket had been placed and the sediment basins were reshaped, reseeded and mulched.

There were no violations noted.

2641091 Primary Facility 2017-09-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. All the annulus vent pipes were connected together and going to the same tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2651594 Primary Facility 2017-10-06 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Scott Rockwell (TEC) conducted the most recent inspection on 10/6/2017.
2705529 Primary Facility 2018-03-13 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted I inspected the Wright well pad on March 13, 2017. The weather was snowy and damp. The access road was muddy but there was a sweeper unit on hand. The cut and fill slopes were stable and the pad surface was muddy but stable. There were some Keane trucks staged on site.

The wells associated with this site are as follows: 115-21915 115-21916 115-21920 are all active 115-21919 plugged.

The wells were all properly labeled. There were no erosional issues apparent.

There were no violations

2747106 Primary Facility 2018-06-29 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. There was water 6' below grade in the cellar with no bubbling noticed and there was no gas detected in the remainder of the cellar. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2804125 Primary Facility 2018-11-15 Site Restoration No Violations Noted I performed a RTNC inspection of the Wright well pad in the course of performing a Notice of Termination inspection for the Wright well connect project.
    The weather was cloudy and the temperature was about 27 degrees F.  Snow was imminent. 
    The access road was stable and solid as was the pad surface (Photo 1).  There were no erosional issues of note on these areas.  Active agriculture was observed in the vicinity of the wellpad, with no adverse impacts noted.
    The slopes and area surrounding the wellpad was well vegetated and the vegetation was healthy and abundant. There were no areas of instability noted (Photos 2 and 3).  Previously during very wet conditions there had been some erosional issues at the site but the areas affected have long since been corrected and were all growing well and stable.
    There were no adverse erosional issues noted at the time of inspection.
    The wells were all correctly labeled (Photo 4).
    There were no violations observed.
2846498 Primary Facility 2019-02-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. There was ice 3' below grade in the cellar and there was no gas detected in the remainder of the cellar. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 2/5/19. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

For data sources see[9]

References