X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-21919

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-21919
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Bridgewater Township
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP
Well Pad ID: 152065
Farm/Lease Name: WRIGHT W 5
License Status: PLUGGED & ABANDONED
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 2014-11-19
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.788222
Longitude: -75.912525

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2014-11-19 New Permit Application
2015-02-16 Performed Spud Operation
2015-02-23 Drilling Completion
2015-06-19 Drilling Completion
2015-09-01 NEWLY DRILLED
2015-09-02 FULLY PLUGGED

For data sources see[4]


Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[5]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2344118 Primary Facility 2015-02-13 Preoperation Inspection No Violations Noted
2347528 Primary Facility 2015-02-24 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted
2380598 Primary Facility 2015-06-19 Plugging(Includes Plugged/Mined Through) No Violations Noted
2557871 Primary Facility 2017-01-26 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection of the Wright well site (ESX13-115-0131). The wells associated with this site are as follows:

115-21915 115-21916 115-21919 115-21920

The Department had previously been on site on January 18, 2017 and there was debris on site at that time. There were sandbags littering the site and there was very little growth on the fill slope of the tank pad (Photo 1). There apparently had been recent excavation work done at that time near the road entrance, and there was an expanse of unmulched/unstabilized ground (Photo 2). At the time, the Department decided to wait and see if the situation was just in limbo due to work having been completed for the day or weather conditions. On January 26, 2016, the Department returned to the site and found the previously noted conditions were the same. The exposed ground was not stabilized nor was any debris removed from the pad site. The fill slope was also not stabilized. It would be recommended that the fi

2600064 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2600101 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2600110 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2627482 Primary Facility 2017-08-21 Follow-up Inspection No Violations Noted I received an email from Mike Pirner of Cabot letting me know most repairs to the Wright well site were now completed. Upon inspection of the site I found that they were indeed completed and stability had been restored to the site previously affected by torrential rains. The entire area was now reseeded, limed, fertilized and mulched. The slopes were starting to green up where erosion blanket had been placed and the sediment basins were reshaped, reseeded and mulched.

There were no violations noted.

2651592 Primary Facility 2017-10-06 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Scott Rockwell (TEC) conducted the most recent inspection on 10/6/2017.
2705526 Primary Facility 2018-03-13 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted I inspected the Wright well pad on March 13, 2017. The weather was snowy and damp. The access road was muddy but there was a sweeper unit on hand. The cut and fill slopes were stable and the pad surface was muddy but stable. There were some Keane trucks staged on site.

The wells associated with this site are as follows: 115-21915 115-21916 115-21920 are all active 115-21919 plugged.

The wells were all properly labeled. There were no erosional issues apparent.

There were no violations

2804123 Primary Facility 2018-11-15 Site Restoration No Violations Noted I performed a RTNC inspection of the Wright well pad in the course of performing a Notice of Termination inspection for the Wright well connect project.
    The weather was cloudy and the temperature was about 27 degrees F.  Snow was imminent. 
    The access road was stable and solid as was the pad surface (Photo 1).  There were no erosional issues of note on these areas.  Active agriculture was observed in the vicinity of the wellpad, with no adverse impacts noted.
    The slopes and area surrounding the wellpad was well vegetated and the vegetation was healthy and abundant. There were no areas of instability noted (Photos 2 and 3).  Previously during very wet conditions there had been some erosional issues at the site but the areas affected have long since been corrected and were all growing well and stable.
    There were no adverse erosional issues noted at the time of inspection.
    The wells were all correctly labeled (Photo 4).
    There were no violations observed.

For data sources see[6]

References