X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-115-21915

Well Details

Well ID: 37-115-21915
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Susquehanna
Municipality: Bridgewater Township
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP
Well Pad ID: 152065
Farm/Lease Name: WRIGHT W 1
License Status: Active
Spud Date: 2015-02-17
Permit Date: 2014-11-19
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: Y
Configuration: Horizontal Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 41.788197
Longitude: -75.912631

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
2014-11-19 New Permit Application
2015-02-16 Performed Spud Operation
2015-04-12 Drilling Completion
2016-08-13 Perforation
2016-10-25 Perforation
2016-10-25 Performed Stage 1 of Stimulation
2016-10-25 Performed Stage 2 of Stimulation
2016-10-26 Perforation
2016-10-26 Performed Stage 3 of Stimulation
2016-10-26 Performed Stage 4 of Stimulation
2016-10-27 Perforation
2016-10-27 Performed Stage 5 of Stimulation
2016-10-27 Performed Stage 6 of Stimulation
2016-10-28 Perforation
2016-10-28 Performed Stage 7 of Stimulation
2016-10-28 Performed Stage 8 of Stimulation
2016-10-29 Perforation
2016-10-29 Performed Stage 9 of Stimulation
2016-10-30 Perforation
2016-10-30 Performed Stage 10 of Stimulation
2016-10-31 Perforation
2016-10-31 Performed Stage 11 of Stimulation
2016-10-31 Performed Stage 12 of Stimulation
2016-11-01 Perforation
2016-11-01 Performed Stage 13 of Stimulation
2016-11-02 Perforation
2016-11-02 Performed Stage 14 of Stimulation
2016-11-03 Perforation
2016-11-03 Performed Stage 15 of Stimulation
2016-11-04 Perforation
2016-11-04 Performed Stage 16 of Stimulation
2016-11-04 Performed Stage 17 of Stimulation
2016-11-05 Perforation
2016-11-05 Performed Stage 18 of Stimulation
2016-11-06 Perforation
2016-11-06 Performed Stage 19 of Stimulation
2016-11-07 Perforation
2016-11-07 Performed Stage 20 of Stimulation
2016-11-07 Performed Stage 21 of Stimulation
2017-01-30 Deviated

For data sources see[4]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 2016-10-24 2016-11-06 6,736 7,540,890 0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 CI-14 Baker Hughes Corrosion Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0004487 319
Water Operator Carrier Water 7732-18-5 100 88.3058 62,874,400.0
Sand, White, 40/70 Baker Hughes Proppant MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 10.6309 7,557,520.0
HCl, 10.1 - 15% Baker Hughes Acidizing MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.283781 201740
Scaletrol 720, 330 gl tote Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0007258 515.943
Other Chemical(s) Baker Hughes See Trade Name(s) List Water 7732-18-5 85 0.335628 238970
Ferrotrol 300L (Totes) Baker Hughes Iron Control MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0019507 1386.74
Scaletrol 5279 Baker Hughes Scale Inhibitor MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0148921 10586.8
Sand, White, 100 mesh Baker Hughes Proppant MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.601259 427435
2-Propenoic acid 2methylpolymer,2methyl-2[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino]1propanesulfonic
acid monosodium
136793-29-8 5 0.0052432 3733.23
Sodium Bisulfite 7631-90-5 1 0.0001487 105.868
Calcium Chloride 10043-52-4 5 0.00003620 25.7971
Phosphonate Salt Trade Secret 2 0.0002974 211.736
Modified Thiourea Polymer 68527-49-1 7 0.00003140 22.33
Fatty Acids 61790-12-3 10 0.00004480 31.9
Propargyl Alcohol 107-19-7 5 0.00002240 15.95
Methanol 67-56-1 100 0.000448 319
2-Propenoic, Polymer with Sodium Phosphinate, Sodium Salt 71050-62-9 20 0.0001449 103.189
Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate 1338-43-8 5 0.0052432 3733.23
Hydrochloric Acid 7647-01-0 15 0.0425054 30264.2
Crystalline Silica (Quartz) 14808-60-7 100 11.2147 7,984,950.0
Olefin 64743-02-8 5 0.00002240 15.95
Citric Acid 77-92-9 60 0.0011686 832.046
Sulfuric acid diammonium salt 7783-20-2 30 0.0314594 22399.4
Potassium Chloride 7447-40-7 1 0.00000720 5.15943
Urea 57-13-6 5 0.0052432 3733.23
1-Propanesulfonic acid 2-methyl-2[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)amino]monosodium
salt, polymer 2-propenamide
38193-60-1 30 0.0314594 22399.4
Glutaraldehyde 111-30-8 30 0.0067505 4806.38
Ethylene Glycol 107-21-1 45 0.0062737 4466.9
Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride 7173-51-5 10 0.0022502 1602.13
Modified carboxylic acid salt Trade Secret 17 0.0025277 1799.76
Quaternary Ammonium Compound 68424-85-1 5 0.0011251 801.063
Sodium Chloride 7647-14-5 1 0.0001559 111.028
Polyoxyalkylenes 68951-67-7 30 0.0001344 95.7
Ethanol 64-17-5 5 0.0011251 801.063
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 1 0.00000450 3.19
Alpha 1427 Baker Hughes Biocide MSDS and Non-MSDS Ingredients are
listed below the green line.
Listed Below 0 0.0225365 16021.3

For data sources see[5]

Stimulation Data

Stimulation Date Phase Number Chemical Agent Volume (gal) Treating Pressure (psi) Breakdown Pressure (psi)
2016-10-25 1 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,850 6,576
2016-10-25 2 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,990 8,505
2016-10-26 3 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,803 7,338
2016-10-26 4 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,512 5,636
2016-10-27 5 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,892 7,897
2016-10-27 6 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,950 7,411
2016-10-28 7 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,860 7,588
2016-10-28 8 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,754 6,272
2016-10-29 9 SAND, WHITE 177,997 8,051 7,537
2016-10-30 10 SAND, WHITE 177,997 8,306 8,502
2016-10-31 11 SAND, WHITE 177,997 8,098 7,246
2016-10-31 12 SAND, WHITE 177,997 8,023 7,600
2016-11-01 13 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,626 6,935
2016-11-02 14 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,414 7,545
2016-11-03 15 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,316 7,110
2016-11-04 16 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,089 7,477
2016-11-04 17 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,047 6,257
2016-11-05 18 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,635 7,122
2016-11-06 19 SAND, WHITE 177,997 7,062 6,319
2016-11-07 20 SAND, WHITE 177,997 6,734 5,054
2016-11-07 21 SAND, WHITE 177,997 6,709 6,913

For data sources see[6]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 693,492.04 41 0.00 0 0.00 0
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 4,306,208.60 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 2,005,285.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP 1,369,422.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Waste Type Quantity Disposal Method Waste Facility ID
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drilling Fluid Waste 311.67 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NC018
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drilling Fluid Waste 420.00 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR119
2015 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Drill Cuttings 1,792.38 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 48.83 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 8,958.91 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 267.01 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Fracturing Fluid Waste 74.86 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2016 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Other Oil & Gas Wastes 0.03 Tons RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY 301333
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Waste Water Treatment Sludge 16.67 Tons LANDFILL THR029
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 7.29 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 338.34 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 19.32 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE004
2017 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 959.98 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Synthetic Liner Materials 2.49 Tons LANDFILL 101247
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 479.11 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002
2018 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 114.81 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NC018
2019 CABOT OIL & GAS CORP Produced Fluid 411.46 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY WMGR123NE002

For data sources see[8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2344116 Primary Facility 2015-02-13 Preoperation Inspection No Violations Noted
2347524 Primary Facility 2015-02-24 Drilling/Alteration No Violations Noted
2535822 Primary Facility 2016-11-10 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 9:10a.m., Baker Hughes was on site and fracking the 1H, 2H, and 6H. I met with company man Wayne Wilridge (Operations Manager). They were fracking stage 19 out of 28 on the 2H and running a plug and perforation in the 6H. The 1H was completed with 21 stages and 27 stages were completed out of 32 on the 6H. The water was being hauled to tanks on the lower pad and pumped to the well pad through a plastic line. The tanks were on containment and it was in good condition. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 10:40a.m.

2552778 Primary Facility 2017-01-17 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection, arrived on site at 11:20a.m., the well was recently completed and is in production. The well tag was on the well and correct. The cellar had water and ice at the bottom with no bubbling noticed, the (20x13) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (13x9) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. There was 710psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed.

I left the site at 11:55a.m.

2557867 Primary Facility 2017-01-26 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection of the Wright well site (ESX13-115-0131). The wells associated with this site are as follows:

115-21915 115-21916 115-21919 115-21920

The Department had previously been on site on January 18, 2017 and there was debris on site at that time. There were sandbags littering the site and there was very little growth on the fill slope of the tank pad (Photo 1). There apparently had been recent excavation work done at that time near the road entrance, and there was an expanse of unmulched/unstabilized ground (Photo 2). At the time, the Department decided to wait and see if the situation was just in limbo due to work having been completed for the day or weather conditions. On January 26, 2016, the Department returned to the site and found the previously noted conditions were the same. The exposed ground was not stabilized nor was any debris removed from the pad site. The fill slope was also not stabilized. It would be recommended that the fi

2599915 Primary Facility 2017-05-16 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted The Department was on site to conduct a Routine Complete Inspection. Upon my arrival I reviewed the E&S Inspection Log to find that the most recent inspection has been conducted on 5/15/17 by Sam Wiernuscz and it was a post precipitation inspection.

During the course of the Department's inspection, I conducted a visual inspection of the wells. I found bubbles forming at the unions on the bull plug, with a gauge, on the production tree of the 2H and 6H wells.

2627473 Primary Facility 2017-08-21 Follow-up Inspection No Violations Noted I received an email from Mike Pirner of Cabot letting me know most repairs to the Wright well site were now completed. Upon inspection of the site I found that they were indeed completed and stability had been restored to the site previously affected by torrential rains. The entire area was now reseeded, limed, fertilized and mulched. The slopes were starting to green up where erosion blanket had been placed and the sediment basins were reshaped, reseeded and mulched.

There were no violations noted.

2641098 Primary Facility 2017-09-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. All the annulus vent pipes were connected together and going to the same tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2651585 Primary Facility 2017-10-06 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Scott Rockwell (TEC) conducted the most recent inspection on 10/6/2017.
2705521 Primary Facility 2018-03-13 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted I inspected the Wright well pad on March 13, 2017. The weather was snowy and damp. The access road was muddy but there was a sweeper unit on hand. The cut and fill slopes were stable and the pad surface was muddy but stable. There were some Keane trucks staged on site.

The wells associated with this site are as follows: 115-21915 115-21916 115-21920 are all active 115-21919 plugged.

The wells were all properly labeled. There were no erosional issues apparent.

There were no violations

2747110 Primary Facility 2018-06-29 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. The cellar was full of water and there was no bubbling noticed. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

2804119 Primary Facility 2018-11-15 Site Restoration No Violations Noted I performed a RTNC inspection of the Wright well pad in the course of performing a Notice of Termination inspection for the Wright well connect project.
    The weather was cloudy and the temperature was about 27 degrees F.  Snow was imminent. 
    The access road was stable and solid as was the pad surface (Photo 1).  There were no erosional issues of note on these areas.  Active agriculture was observed in the vicinity of the wellpad, with no adverse impacts noted.
    The slopes and area surrounding the wellpad was well vegetated and the vegetation was healthy and abundant. There were no areas of instability noted (Photos 2 and 3).  Previously during very wet conditions there had been some erosional issues at the site but the areas affected have long since been corrected and were all growing well and stable.
    There were no adverse erosional issues noted at the time of inspection.
    The wells were all correctly labeled (Photo 4).
    There were no violations observed.
2846500 Primary Facility 2019-02-28 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted At time of inspection.

The well was in production. There was ice 2.5' below grade in the cellar and I was unable to check for gas. The (20x13), (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was no gas detected at the poly vent tank with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 2/5/19. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted.

For data sources see[9]

References