If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-115-21250 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":41.844556,"lon":-75.959611,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Susquehanna | |
Municipality: Forest Lake Township | |
Operator Name: CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | |
Well Pad ID: 145128 | |
Farm/Lease Name: GILLINGHAM M 2 | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2013-04-25 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 41.844556 | |
Longitude: -75.959611 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2013-04-25 | New Permit Application |
2013-05-24 | Performed Spud Operation |
2013-07-05 | Drilling Completion |
2013-08-10 | Perforation |
2013-08-27 | Performed Stimulation |
2014-03-13 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2013-08-26 | 2013-09-03 | 6,235 | 5,496,620 | 0 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Other Chemicals | Sorbitan Monooleate | Trade Secret | 0 | 0.0031289 | 1649.11 | ||
Ethoxylated Alcohol | Trade Secret | 0 | 0.0012516 | 659.644 | ||||
Water | 7732-18-5 | 0 | 0.0545002 | 28724.3 | ||||
Potassium Chloride | 7447-40-7 | 0 | 0.00000780 | 4.1325 | ||||
Hydrochloric Acid | 7647-01-0 | 0 | 0.00000940 | 4.93 | ||||
Polyacrylate | Trade Secret | 0 | 0.0031363 | 1653 | ||||
Modified Thiorea Polymer | 68527-49-1 | 0 | 0.00006550 | 34.51 | ||||
Poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) | Trade Secret | 0 | 0.0187737 | 9894.66 | ||||
Salt | Trade Secret | 0 | 0.0031289 | 1649.11 | ||||
Sodium Chloride | 7647-14-5 | 0 | 0.00000470 | 2.4795 | ||||
Formaldehyde | 50-00-0 | 0 | 0.00000940 | 4.93 | ||||
Alpha 1427 | Baker Hughes | Biocide | Quaternary Ammonium Compound | 68424-85-1 | 5 | 0.0012236 | 644.875 | |
Ethanol | 64-17-5 | 5 | 0.0012236 | 644.875 | ||||
Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride | 7173-51-5 | 10 | 0.0024471 | 1289.75 | ||||
Glutaraldehyde | 111-30-8 | 30 | 0.0073413 | 3869.25 | ||||
HCl, 10.1 - 15% | Baker Hughes | Acidizing | Water | 7732-18-5 | 85 | 0.530101 | 279389 | |
Hydrochloric Acid | 7647-01-0 | 15 | 0.0935472 | 49304 | ||||
Sand, White, 40/70 | Baker Hughes | Proppant | Crystalline Silica (Quartz) | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 11.6543 | 6,142,400.0 | |
FRW-18 | Baker Hughes | Friction Reducer | Petroleum Distillates | 64742-47-8 | 30 | 0.0187737 | 9894.66 | |
Scaletrol 720 | Baker Hughes | Scale Inhibitor | Calcium Chloride | 10043-52-4 | 5 | 0.0007841 | 413.25 | |
Ethylene Glycol | 107-21-1 | 30 | 0.0047045 | 2479.5 | ||||
Water | Operator | Carrier | Water | 7732-18-5 | 100 | 86.9553 | 45,829,800.0 | |
Sand, White, 100 mesh | Baker Hughes | Proppant | Crystalline Silica (Quartz) | 14808-60-7 | 100 | 0.643962 | 339400 | |
CI-14 | Baker Hughes | Corrosion Inhibitor | Propargyl Alcohol | 107-19-7 | 5 | 0.00004680 | 24.65 | |
Fatty Acids | Trade Secret | 10 | 0.00009350 | 49.3 | ||||
Methanol | 67-56-1 | 100 | 0.0009354 | 493 | ||||
Polyoxyalkylenes | Trade Secret | 30 | 0.0002806 | 147.9 | ||||
Olefin | Trade Secret | 5 | 0.00004680 | 24.65 | ||||
Ferrotrol 300L | Baker Hughes | Iron Control | Citric Acid | 77-92-9 | 60 | 0.0008134 | 428.695 |
For data sources see[5]
Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013-08-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 739,038.96 | 89 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2014 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 1,845,133.19 | 354 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 1,108,200.94 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 1,070,268.94 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 761,673.65 | 352 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 613,013.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | 537,999.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[7]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drilling Fluid Waste | 235.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drill Cuttings | 875.26 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drilling Fluid Waste | 35.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE001 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Fracing Fluid Waste | 879.67 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE001 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 12,970.96 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drilling Fluid Waste | 330.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | WMGR123NE002 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Drill Cuttings | 473.39 Tons | LANDFILL | THR029 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 1,908.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE001 |
2013 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Fracing Fluid Waste | 2,978.75 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2014 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 4,035.78 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2014 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 19.75 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE001 |
2015 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 775.65 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 213.64 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 518.03 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123NE002 |
2016 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 135.44 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 53.21 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Synthetic Liner Materials | 1.05 Tons | LANDFILL | 101247 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 433.94 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
2017 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 14.02 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123 |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 13.87 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 274.17 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2018 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 172.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NC018 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 383.47 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE002 |
2019 | CABOT OIL & GAS CORP | Produced Fluid | 12.77 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123NE004 |
For data sources see[8]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2173924 | Primary Facility | 2013-05-29 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | Conductor set |
2184758 | Primary Facility | 2013-05-17 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | pre-operations |
2219047 | Primary Facility | 2013-07-09 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | Patterson 253 - currently at 1846' |
2351212 | Primary Facility | 2015-03-04 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department was on site to conduct a routine complete inspection of the Gillingham well pad. |
2408440 | Primary Facility | 2015-09-21 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
2505621 | Primary Facility | 2016-07-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 9:30a.m., the cellar was full of water with no bubbling noticed, the (13x9) vent pipe was open and venting into a tank, the (9x5) vent pipe was open and venting into a tank, there was 565psi on the production casing, I took a walk around the location and everything looked OK.
I left the site at 10:05a.m. |
2544773 | Primary Facility | 2016-11-30 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department was on site to conduct a routine complete inspection of the Gillingham well pad (ESX11-115-0200).
Well permits associated with this site are as follows: 115-20849 115-20850 115-20851 115-20852 115-21249 115-21250 115-21251 115-21252 The site was stable, with excellent growth throughout. There were still tiered filter sock BMPs still in place, starting to deteriorate. Due to the abundance of good perennial vegetation, it can be suggested to repair or remove the filter sock, at the Operator's discretion. There is a local quarry off the South side of the pad. Was raining very hard at time of inspection, however there appeared to be no runoff from the site affecting anything off the LOD.
There were no violations. |
2604208 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-13 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection, arrived on site at 13:55p.m.
The cellar had water at the bottom with no bubbling noticed. The (13x9) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank, the (9x5) annulus vent pipe was open and venting into a small plastic tank. There was 607psi on the production casing. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. I left the site at 14:30p.m. |
2709583 | Primary Facility | 2018-03-20 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. There was ice 4' below grade in the cellar and was unable to check for gas. The (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same tank. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
2809468 | Primary Facility | 2018-12-03 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At time of inspection.
The well was in production. The cellar was full of water and over flowing onto the well site and there was no bubbling noticed. There was no sheen noticed on the water and would suggest the cellar be emptied. The (13x9) and (9x5) annuli vent pipes were connected together and going to the same poly vent tank. There was gas detected at the poly vent tank with a MSA Altair 5X multi gas detector that was calibrated on 12/3/18. I took a walk around the location and there were no obvious concerns noticed. There were no violations noted. |
2821375 | Primary Facility | 2019-01-02 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | I performed a RTNC inspection of the Gillingham Well Site and Tank Farm. The weather at the time of inspection was partly sunny and slightly above freezing.
Due to ongoing wet conditions, the pad surface was wet, but not unstable. The well pad access road was a bit muddy but was not to the point of allowing mud to leave the site. The cut slope was very rocky but stable. There was not an abundance of vegetation on the cut slope due to the extremely rocky conditions. The fill slope had a heavy crop of vegetation occupying it. The slope was stable and solid. The tank pad was solid and stable as well, with cut and fill slopes having no erosional issues at the time of inspection. The well site signage was clearly visible and the E&S log was up to date, having been updated today. The wells on site were clearly labeled. The tank pad surface was stable and overgrown with encroaching vegetation. The fill slope of the tank pad was well vegetated and stable. There were no erosion |
For data sources see[9]