X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-031-26760

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-26760
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: Jackson Township
Operator Name: DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTION LLC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: OXFORD - PEABODY
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2000-02-04
Spud Date: 2000-02-17
Spud Drilling Contractor: PROFESSIONAL WELL SVC-PWS
Final Drill Date: 2000-02-22
Well Total Depth: 3823.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.250000
Longitude: -81.970000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2000-02-04 Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:2/4/00, Expired Date:2/3/01 6:00:00 AM, Drilling unit acres:20, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Original Spud 2000-02-17 RBDMS Rec
Completed 2000-02-22 RBDMS Rec
Reached Total Depth 2000-02-22 RBDMS Rec
Completion Report Received 2000-05-30 RBDMS Rec
Construction Permit Expires 2001-02-03 RBDMS Rec
Change of Owner 2014-02-06 Operator changed from 79, OXFORD OIL to 9216, ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC
Change of Owner 2016-08-02 Operator changed from 9216, ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC to 8685, M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC
Record Last Modified 2017-02-15 RBDMS Rec

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2000-08-09 3667 3718 22
3667 3718 22
3667 3718 22

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 2475 Bbl 30000

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2000 OXFORD OIL 15861.00 120.00 0
2001 OXFORD OIL 14865.00 62.00 365
2002 OXFORD OIL 19937.00 39.00 365
2003 OXFORD OIL 5503.00 17.00 365
2004 OXFORD OIL 3468.00 20.00 365
2005 OXFORD OIL 2574.00 19.00 365
2006 OXFORD OIL 1802.00 0.00 365
2007 OXFORD OIL 1449.00 23.00 365
2008 OXFORD OIL 1592.00 0.00 0
2009 OXFORD OIL 1447.00 0.00 0
2010 OXFORD OIL 1098.00 19.00 365
2011 OXFORD OIL 1012.00 8.00 0
2012 OXFORD OIL 948.00 0.00 0
2013 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC 906.00 0.00 365
2014 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC 682.00 14.00 365
2015 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC 593.00 6.00 365
2016 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC 0.00 0.00 365
2017 M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC 477.00 0.00 365
2018 M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC 342.00 0.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2000 OXFORD OIL Brine 208
2001 OXFORD OIL Brine 65 365
2002 OXFORD OIL Brine 98 365
2003 OXFORD OIL Brine 7 365
2004 OXFORD OIL Brine 7 365
2005 OXFORD OIL Brine 8 365
2006 OXFORD OIL Brine 21 365
2007 OXFORD OIL Brine 0 365
2008 OXFORD OIL Brine 8
2009 OXFORD OIL Brine 7
2010 OXFORD OIL Brine 0 365
2011 OXFORD OIL Brine 18
2012 OXFORD OIL Brine 12
2013 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC Brine 0 365
2014 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC Brine 5 365
2015 ECLIPSE RESOURCES-OHIO LLC Brine 0 365
2016 M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC Brine 0 365
2017 M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC Brine 0 365
2018 M & R INVESTMENTS OHIO LLC Brine 0 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1481594318 2003-1-15 0:00: PW No Violations
-1540519903 2017-10-20 0:00 PW No Violations
0108717868 2017-09-19 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I accompanied DOGRM Emergency Response Supervisor Trisha Cartmell to the site to do a follow up on the remediation. The area where the oil contaminated soil had been excavated and hauled was still bare and covered in old straw. There were multiple spots in the bare area where residual oil contamination was visible at the surface. The area of the heaviest oi saturation was very close to the location of the line repair. I called Dale Smith to report what I had found and to ask that he come back out to remove the oily soil. I also recommended that they dig down to the line to determine whether the oil in the soil was left over from the original incident, or the line was leaking again. Dale said that he would be out tomorrow with a track-hoe, and he would call me when they arrived.
0489192442 2017-09-21 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that M&R had a crew on site treating the soil with Bio-sorb. Dale Smith called me earlier in the day to let me know that he had spoken with the Woodbury Wildlife Area manager, who was going to send me an email granting them permission to remediate the soil in place. Dale also said that he would treat the soil with the Bio-sorb to neutralize the hydrocarbons, and then he would add some lime and fertilizer to foster vegetative growth.
108717868 2017-9-19 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
1170436600 2012-08-13 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the well head was equipped with a pumping unit and connected to a tank battery that consisted of one 100 barrel stock tank, one 30 barrel poly brine storage tank, one separator and an earthen dike. Proper identification was posted and there were no leaks or spills at the well head or tank battery. This well shares a tank battery with permits 6701 and 6814. No violations at this time.
1340451878 2003-07-17 Preliminary Restoration No Violations passed
1481594318 2003-01-15 Production Wells No Violations
1486661975 2017-02-09 Production Wells No Violations I received a phone call from Dale Smith, field supervisor for M&R Investments, to notify me that they had discovered a flow line leak near this well. He said that the leak was discovered last night. The pumper reported that the well was not selling gas, so Dale went out to walk the flow lines and found the oil on the surface approximately 150 feet from the wellhead. They shut the well in for the night and reported the leak to me first thing in the morning. When I met Dale at the site I found that they already had the line dug up and had located the source of the leak. There was approximately 3 inches of snow cover, and we were unable to accurately gauge the extent of the oil on the surface. The leak was located in open grassland habitat. No waters of the State were affected. Dales crew excavated the soil around the buried line so they could replace three joints. The subsurface migration of oil was minimal. Most of the oil was pushed directly to the surface and spread down grade through the grasses. They excavated the contaminated soil from around the line and on the surface. They stockpiled the soil for removal. Dale said that he could not get a roll-off in until tomorrow morning. I told Dale to get what they could today, but we will have to wait for the snow to thaw to complete the clean-up. The temperature is predicted to rise to 50 - 60 degrees Fahrenheit within the next two days.
1486750508 2017-02-10 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met Dale Smith at the site. He had a roll-off container to haul away the impacted soil. He still had the ditch open from replacing two joints of steel flow line. I found no remaining crude oil in the subsurface soil. I told him that it was alright to fill the ditch in. The area where they had scraped oil from the surface was bare and not covered in snow. I found no remaining crude oil in that area, but the surrounding landscape was still snow covered. I asked Dale to leave the roll-off on site until Monday morning to allow for the snow to melt. Then we will be able to get an accurate assessment of the extent of the oil impact and remove any remaining contamination.
1487000151 2017-02-13 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that there was very little crude oil left on the ground. There was one area at the lowest end of the previously excavated soil that had collected some residual crude oil in the snow melt/rain water. I called Dale Smith and he said that he was on his way out to shovel up the remaining oil. The roll-off was still on location and scheduled to be removed tomorrow. Dale said that Tim Althier would email me a copy of the manifest. Dale also said that he would be meeting with the wildlife area manager to discuss a re-seeding plan for the affected area.
1501711771 2017-09-20 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met Dale Smith at the site where they had a flow line leak earlier this year. The crew excavated the soil from around the flow line and turned the well on. We found no new leaks in the line. We determined that the oil stains in the surface soil was due to residual oil left behind from the original leak. I told Dale that he could bio-remediate in place only if he got written permission from the Woodbury Wildlife Area manager. I also told Dale that he would need to submit a written remediation plan to include method of treatment, proposed timeline/schedule, and seeding plan.
1507900426 2017-10-12 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with Trish Cartmell and Jason Blocker with the Emergency Response Section to look at the progress of the clean-up. The ditch around the flow line was still open and collecting rain water. There were no indications that the line was leaking. There was a darker coloration to the water, but no floating oil skim. The soil had been spread out around the area and there were bags of Biosorb and fertilizer on the ground. I spoke to Dale Smith with M&R on my way out to the site. He said that his crew has been out three times to treat and churn the soil. Trish, Jason and I all agreed to have Dale fill the ditch back in, grade the soil out and seed the area. We would like to see some vegetative growth before winter weather sets in. Trisha and Jason agreed to waive the landowner permission requirement because the leak was on State of Ohio property.
1509639683 2017-11-02 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with Trish Cartmell and Jason Blocker with DOGRM - ERS to look at the site. The area was graded, seeded and covered in straw. There was some sparse grass growth. We did not find any signs of residual oil contamination in the soil. The Emergency Response Section said that they were closing the case. I will check back in the spring of 2018 for vegetative coverage.
1540519903 2017-10-20 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the flow line ditch had been filled in and the bio-remediated area had been graded out to the surrounding contour. The area was covered in seed and straw. I spoke with Dale Smith, field superintendent for M&R, who said that he had received instructions from the Woodbury Wildlife Area manager with regards to the seed mixture. I will check back in the Spring for vegetative growth.
1776000667 2018-01-04 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the well was equipped with an electric powered pumping unit. The motor, drive belts and electric were intact. The flow lines were connected at the wellhead and the tubing valve was open. The production equipment is shared with permits 6701 and 6814. It consisted of one 100 barrel steel tank, one 20 barrel poly tank and one vertical separator in an earthen dike. Correct, legible identification was posted and I found no leaks or spills. The area that was remediated from a flow line leak earlier this year was snow covered, but there were no signs of crude oil in the snow.
1955470300 2015-09-14 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that the wellhead was equipped with a pumping unit. The motor was intact and the valves were open. The tank battery consisted of one 100 barrel tank, one 20 barrel poly tank, one separator and an earthen dike. Identification was posted and I found no leaks or spills. The tank battery is shared with permits 6701 and 6814.
450498349 2020-1-30 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
489192442 2017-9-21 0:00: PW No Violations 0.30

For data sources see[9]

References