If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 34-031-26271 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.25,"lon":-81.74,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Ohio | |
County: Coshocton | |
Municipality: Lafayette Township | |
Operator Name: RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: BLUCK | |
License Status: Final Restoration | |
License Date: 2017-01-11 | |
Spud Date: 1990-08-19 | |
Spud Drilling Contractor: CUBBY DRLG | |
Final Drill Date: 1990-08-25 | |
Well Total Depth: 6658.00 ft | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Latitude: 40.250000 | |
Longitude: -81.740000 |
For data sources see[1]
Well Status | Well Status Date | Comment |
---|---|---|
CO | 1990-05-02 | 168 RED HILL DEVELOPMENT GeoDate 5/2/90 |
Oil and Gas | 1990-05-02 | Issued Date 5/2/90 Expired Date 5/2/91 Acres 0087560 Tool Type CRAF Proposed Formation ROSE RUN Proposed Depth 06658 Proposed Drill Depth 06658 |
Original Spud | 1990-08-19 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
Completed | 1990-08-25 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
Reached Total Depth | 1990-08-25 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
Completion Report Received | 1991-02-27 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
APP | 2017-01-11 | Proposed Formations:CLINTON, Issued Date:1/11/2017, Expired Date:1/11/2019 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:87.56, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class: |
Plugged/Abandoned | 2017-02-16 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
Record Last Modified | 2017-08-08 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
Construction Permit Expires | 2019-01-11 | GMM UPDATED PLUG STATUS PER PLUG REPORT |
For data sources see[2]
Perforation Date | Interval Top (ft) | Interval Base (ft) | Number of Shots |
---|---|---|---|
1997-06-29 | 6484 | 6615 | 3 |
6484 | 6615 | 3 | |
6484 | 6615 | 3 |
For data sources see[3]
Stimulation Date | Chemical Agent | Chemical Agent Concentration (%) | Fracking Fluid Volume | Mass of Proppant Used (lb) | Fracking Company | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACID | 15 | 1500 Gal | 0 | ACIDIZED W/1500 GAL 15% HCL |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
1994 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 101.00 | 365 |
1995 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 131.00 | 365 |
1998 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2004 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 103.00 | 365 |
2005 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2006 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 509.00 | 60.00 | 365 |
2007 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 1205.00 | 108.00 | 365 |
2008 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 433.00 | 36.00 | 365 |
2009 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 65.00 | 365 |
2010 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 24.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2011 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 3840.00 | 0.00 | 365 |
2012 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 104.00 | 366 |
2013 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 50.00 | 365 |
2014 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 50.00 | 365 |
2016 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 29.00 | 365 |
2017 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | 0.00 | 93.00 | 365 |
Period | Operator Name | Waste Type | Quantity (bbl) | Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1994 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1995 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
1998 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 10 | 365 |
2004 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 112 | 365 |
2005 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 26 | 365 |
2006 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 573 | 365 |
2007 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 546 | 365 |
2008 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 470 | 365 |
2009 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2010 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2011 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2012 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 366 |
2013 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2014 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 0 | 365 |
2016 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 13 | 365 |
2017 | RHDK OIL & GAS LLC/DBA RED HIL | Brine | 411 | 365 |
Inspection ID | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
-1066996677 | 2017-2-13 0:00: | PB | No Violations | 3.00 |
-1571091213 | 2017-2-8 0:00:0 | PB | No Violations | 2.50 |
-1752499164 | 2003-12-11 0:00 | PW | No Violations | |
-1824263896 | 2017-7-27 0:00: | FR | No Violations | 0.70 |
-1957750676 | 2009-7-24 0:00: | PW | No Violations | |
-238897427 | 2017-2-21 0:00: | PB | No Violations | 0.70 |
0000015548 | Preliminary Restoration | No Violations | PASSED Y WITNESSED 6/11/91 INSPECTOR DATE 06/1119/91 DATA FROM OLD VAX INFO | |
0238897427 | 2017-02-21 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the frac tank and the half-round tank were still at the site. The earthen lined pit had been closed. The surface casing had not been cut and capped yet. It was shut in with a swage and valve. I had spoken with Dave Gross with Red Hill and asked that he notify me when they would be cutting the casing and capping it with a plate. |
0287223458 | 2013-03-06 | Production Wells | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the well head was equipped with a pumping unit. The tank battery consisted of one 210 barrel stock tank, two separators and an earthen dike. There were no leaks or spills and proper identification was posted. No violations at this time. |
0913174092 | 2017-02-09 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell was pulling rods and tubing. They had to do a stripping job and the string was pulling wet. They had a pit dug and lined for the fluid in the tubing. They will be running the tubing back in to set the bottom plug. |
0958940537 | 2017-03-10 | Final Restoration | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the surface casing had not been cut and capped yet. The casing was still shut in with a swage. There was still one frac tank and one half-round on site. There was also a bulldozer left at the site. There were no leaks around the tanks. |
1066996677 | 2017-02-13 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell had lost the last three joints of tubing and downhole pump when they were pulling it. They went in and tagged the top of the tubing at a depth of 6510 feet. The tubing had fallen below the perforations, which are located at a depth of 6484 to 6486 feet. I spoke with Dave Gross, supervisor for Red Hill, and gave him authorization to leave the tubing in the hole. The bottom plug will be set above the tubing at the perforations. Bakerwell ran tubing to a depth of 6462 feet. |
1087396913 | 2007-03-14 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well capable of production . 1-210 storage tank . |
1169677049 | 2017-02-24 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the wellhead had not been cut and capped yet. The frac tank and half-round were still on site. There was a dozer there and there had been some more grading since the last inspection. I spoke with Dave Gross of Red Hill and he said that he was still trying to line up a crew to cut and cap the wellhead. |
1487085429 | 2017-02-14 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection Petroset moved in to set the bottom plug. They broke circulation with fresh water. Bakerwell was circulating into a steel half-round, open top tank. Petroset pumped a 30 sack class A cement plug and displaced with 23.5 barrels of salt water. Circulation was maintained throughout the job. Petroset rigged down and Bakerwell started pulling the tubing. They blew a hydraulic hose and had to shut down for repairs. They made the repair and finished pulling tubing. The rig crew dug out around the surface casing head and nipples. They found that there was gas pressure on the surface casing and it flowed some oil when they opened the nipple valve. They connected a line from the surface casing to the steel half-round and let the annulus flow until the pressure blew down. Baker well had a very weak intermittent telegraph at 5330 feet. They ripped there and parted the casing. The rig operator pulled the casing up 5 or 6 feet to ensure it was free and they shut down for the evening. |
1487184260 | 2017-02-15 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection Petroset hooked up and pumped salt water down the 4.5 inch casing to circulate the oil out of the well. They pumped 135 barrels and circulated approximately 60 barrels of oil into the half-round. The well started flowing back when they stopped pumping. It had flowed approximately 40 barrels back when Paul Hesse of Petroset claiimed he observed signs that there was a possible gas pocket working its way up the 4.5 inch casing. He discussed pumping and circulating again with Dave Gross and me. We agreed that they should pump again. Petroset pumped approximately 110 barrels of salt water down the well. They lost circulation and never re-established it. The lift pressure increased to 1000 pounds. They stopped pumping and the well flowed back again. Bakerwell tried to pull the casing and found that it was hung. They pulled 60,000 pounds and got 47 inches of stretch. We calculated that they should have free pipe below the Clinton sand. Bakerwell went back in to 4600 feet to rip a second time. The well was still flowing back at a slow rate. Bakerwell got the casing ripped off at 4530 feet and the flow back ceased. Bakerwell pulled 7 joints to come up to the bottom of the Clinton plug at 4238 feet. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 60 sack cement plug, displaced with 63 barrels of salt water. Baker well pulled 32 joints to come up to the bottom of the Big Lime plug at 2908 feet. Petroset established circulation and pumped a 50 sack cement plug, displaced with 43 barrels of salt water. Baker well pulled 44 joints to come up to the bottom of the surface casing plug at 1020 feet and shut down for the night. They packed the wellhead off and shut the 4.5 inch casing in. |
1487255247 | 2017-02-16 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection Petroset established circulation and pumped a 55 sack cement plug at the base of the surface casing. Bakerwell pulled 19 joints to come up to a depth of 200 feet for the surface plug. Petroset established circulation and pumped until cement was circulated to the surface. They shut down and the cement fell back 8 feet and stayed. Bakerwell shut the well in with an 8 inch swage. |
1490880373 | 2017-03-30 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | I was contacted by Dave Gross of Red Hill to notify me that they would have a crew out to cut the well casing off and cap it. On the day of my inspection I found that the crew was already on site and had the casing cut off 36 inches below grade. The casing was full of water and I could not see the top of the cement. I taped a rock to a reel tape measure and dropped it down the hole. The top of the cement was 5 feet down from where the casing was cut. Red Hill had a numbered steel plate prepared to cap the well. The frac tank and half-round were still on site. The crew members did not know when the tanks are scheduled to be removed. |
15548 | PL | No Violations | ||
1571091213 | 2017-02-08 | Plug / Plug Back | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that Bakerwell was rigged up to plug the well. They were starting to pull rods. The pit had not been dug or lined. I spoke with Chris Kimble on the phone about the plug placement. |
1752499164 | 2003-12-11 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well in production . Gas well |
1824263896 | 2017-07-27 | Final Restoration | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that all oilfield materials and debris had been removed from the well site. The site had been final graded and was 95% covered in well established grass. The surrounding landscape is flat and there were no signs of erosion. The lane that was used to access the well is still in use as a driveway. The production tanks were removed and the dike had been graded out and seeded. The former tank site was 80% covered in grass. There was one horizontal separator left behind. I called Red Hill to ask about the separator. The secretary took my information and said that she would pass it along to one of their field staff. I got a call back and they confirmed the separator that was left behind is in use for permit 2264. The Red Hill site passes final restoration. |
1917435254 | 2008-10-07 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well in production . |
1957750676 | 2009-07-24 | Production Wells | No Violations | Well capable of production . |
2093203538 | 2017-04-05 | Final Restoration | No Violations | On the day of my inspection I found that the well site still needed a lot of work. The frac tank and half round were still on site. The dozer was still on site. None of the area had been graded and there were still pieces of the cement pumping unit platform left behind. |
2118572032 | 2011-03-21 | Production Wells | No Violations | (Pumping well) Well capable of production. |
287223458 | 2013-3-6 0:00:0 | PW | No Violations | |
913174092 | 2017-2-9 0:00:0 | PB | No Violations | 2.00 |
958940537 | 2017-3-10 0:00: | FR | No Violations | 0.50 |
For data sources see[9]