X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-013-20951

Well Details

Well ID: 34-013-20951
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Belmont
Municipality: Mead Township
Operator Name: XTO ENERGY INC.
Well Pad ID: US-OH-001250
Farm/Lease Name: HELLER UNIT B
License Status: Producing
License Date: 2016-01-05
Spud Date: 2015-12-05
Spud Drilling Contractor: PATTERSON DRILLING
Final Drill Date: 2016-02-08
Well Total Depth: 20325.00 ft
Configuration: Horizontal
Latitude: 39.980000
Longitude: -80.880000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
APP 2015-06-05 Proposed Formations:POINT PLEASANT, Issued Date:6/5/2015, Expired Date:6/4/2017 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:492.446, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:EDPW
APP 2015-12-03 Proposed Formations:TRENTON, Issued Date:12/3/2015, Expired Date:12/2/2017 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:0, Proposed Well Type:ST, Proposed Well Class:STRT
APP 2016-01-05 Proposed Formations:POINT PLEASANT, Issued Date:1/5/2016, Expired Date:1/4/2018 12:00:00 PM, Drilling unit acres:248.96, Proposed Well Type:OG, Proposed Well Class:POOL
Reached Total Depth 2016-02-08
Correction to Well 2016-03-11 change in take and target per as-drilled plat-ALE
Completion Report Received 2016-09-27
Record Last Modified 2017-10-23
Construction Permit Expires 2018-01-04

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2016-09-27 10830 20016 0
10830 20016 0
10830 20016 0

For data sources see[3]

Fracking Activities

Fracking Jobs

Job Number Job Start Date Job End Date True Vertical Depth (ft) Total Water Volume (gal) Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
1 05/16/2016 06/13/2016 10008 21,375,400.0

Fluid Composition Data

Job Number Trade Name Supplier Purpose Ingredient Name CAS Number Additive Percentage by Mass Job Percentage by Mass Mass Used (lb)
1 Hydrochloric Acid (15%) Jones Hamilton Acidizing Listed Below
Friction Reducer, Unislick ST-50 CESI Chemical Friction Reducer Listed Below
Carboeconoprop Carbo Ceramics Proppant Listed Below
Clay Stabilizer, Cla-Chek G Shrieve Clay Stabilizer Listed Below
Scale Inhibitor, ScaleHib A Nalco Scale Inhibitor Listed Below
Water XTO Carrier/Base Fluid 7732-18-5 89.76
Unigel 5F Universal Well Services, Inc Viscosifier Listed Below
Sand (Proppant) Universal Proppant Listed Below
Aluminum oxide 1344-28-1 0.8 0.0451 89618
Ethoxylated alcohol 68002-97-1 35 0.00033 656
Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 30 0.00485 9645
Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 15 0.03608 71707
2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide 10222-01-2 20 0.00215 4279
Ammonium acetate 631-61-8 13 0.0094 18673
Ammonium persulfate 7727-54-0 100 0.00036 707
Alcohols, ethoxylated 68439-50-9 5 0.00361 7182
Alcohols, ethoxylated 68551-12-2 5 0.00361 7182
Thiourea 62-56-6 1 0.00001000 19
Water 7732-18-5 15 0.00508 10092
Short chained glycol ether 112-34-5 60 0.00057 1124
Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 15 0.041 81486
Alcohols, ethoxylated 68002-97-1 5 0.00361 7182
Acetophenone 98-86-2 1 0.00001000 19
Guar gum 9000-30-0 95 0.02449 48664
Triethanolamine Tri(Phosphate Ester), Sodium 68171-29-9 30 0.00485 9645
Petroleum distillates, hydrotreated light 64742-47-8 30 0.02168 43091
titanium oxide 13463-67-7 0.1 0.00564 11202
Hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 15 0.08693 172749
Water 7732-18-5 30 0.00323 6418
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 1 0.00001000 19
Water 7732-18-5 85 0.92941 1,847,010.0
Methanol 67-56-1 5 0.00005000 94
Choline chloride 67-48-1 75 0.02539 50459
Polyethylene glycol 25322-68-3 50 0.00538 10697
Crystalline silica quartz 14808-60-7 99.9 5.63132 11,191,000.0
Iron oxide 1309-37-1 0.1 0.00564 11202
K-BAC 1020 WST Biocide Listed Below
Hydrochloric Acid (15%) Axiall Acidizing
Acid Inhibitor, Unihib G GeoSafe Acid Inhibitor Listed Below
AP Breaker United Initiators Gel Breaker Listed Below
Hydrochloric Acid (15%) PVS Acidizing

For data sources see[4]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
2016-06-13 H2O 0 14450 Bbl 488500 Universal Well Services Inc. STAGE 37/37

60 SHOTS

2016-05-16 H2O 0 12212 Bbl 476100 Universal Well Services Inc. STAGE 1/37

60 SHOTS STAGES 2-36 SEE IMAGES

For data sources see[5]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2016 XTO ENERGY INC. 1418351 0 144
2017 XTO ENERGY INC. 4064465 0 343
2018 XTO ENERGY INC. 3947875 0 365
2019 XTO ENERGY INC. 719083 0 90

For data sources see[6] [7]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
2016 XTO ENERGY INC. Brine 10042 144
2017 XTO ENERGY INC. Brine 26129 343
2018 XTO ENERGY INC. Brine 18225 365
2019 XTO ENERGY INC. Brine 3283 90

For data sources see[8] [9]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1857023834 2020-4-16 0:00: PL No Violations 0.40
-1921070467 2015-12-5 0:00: CS No Violations 5.00
-2061456306 2018-8-23 0:00: PW No Violations 0.50
1048456255 2017-06-07 Completion Testing No Violations On the day of my inspection the well appeared to be in the flow back phase. The well was connected to a sand separator and a 500 barrel fluid holding tank. The tank battery consisted of four 400 barrel production fluid holding tanks and gas processing units. Also on site, were eight 500 barrel fluid holding tanks that were just on the left of the pad as I entered. They did not appear to currently be in use at this time.
1120649150 2018-04-23 Production Wells No Violations The well is equipped with 5.5-inch diameter production casing. The well appears to be free flowing with no artificial lift technology present. The well is piped to a gas processing unit. From there, it is routed to a production area that contains four 400-barrel production fluid holding tanks. Annular pressures readings supplied by the company were 330 pounds in between the outside of the 9.625-inch diameter casing and the inside of the 13.375-inch diameter casing and 372 pounds between the outside of the 5.5-inch diameter casing and the inside of the 9.625-inch diameter casing. The production records within RBDMS are currently updated to 2017.
1449770108 2015-12-08 Casing String Witnessed No Violations On this day First Class had reached a total depth of 600. The 18.625 conductor was ran inside a 24 open hole to a depth of 569. was on site to cement the casing with 1000 sacks of Class H cement. Cement to surface established.
1546524996 2019-01-03 Production Wells No Violations On site inspection found the lease road and well pad surface to be stone construction and in good repair, there is no earthen berm around the well pad. A gate is present across the lease road and signage is posted at the lease road entry point and at each well head. There are 2 wells present on the pad producing through tubing heads and choke manifolds with (2) 500 barrel production tanks present to service the choke manifolds. Annular pressure monitoring is in place. The production facility consists of (4) steel 400 barrel capacity tanks situated inside a polymer lined steel containment dike area. 2 line heaters are also present inside the production facility containment.
1921070467 2015-12-05 Casing String Witnessed No Violations On this day Express Energy had reached a total depth of 100. The 30 conductor was ran inside a 36 open hole to a depth of 100. Express Energy was on site to cement the casing with 275 sacks of Class A cement. Cement to surface established.
2061456306 2018-08-23 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I witnessed that the well was currently using flow back equipment including a sand trap and choke manifold system, the sand trap was connected to 1 500-barrel mobile fluid storage tank. There were 3 additional 500-barrel mobile fluid storage tanks on location. The well head was equipped with 5.5-inch diameter production casing that appeared to be open flowing. Annular pressure monitoring was in place but had no digital readouts available for reference, there were annular pressure bleed down lines on both the 9.625-inch diameter casing, and 13.375-inch diameter casing, at the time of my inspection the 9.625-inch diameter casing valve was closed, and the 13.375-inch diameter casing valve was open and flowing through a choke manifold. There was also a tank vault near the well head containing hydrate inhibitor. Production equipment included a gas processing unit and 4 400-barrel production fluid tanks that were shared with the other wells on the pad. There was secondary containment around the production fluid tanks and gas processing units. Identification tags were present, and production reports were current.

For data sources see[10]

References

  1. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well, tblLocational, tblPlugWell, tblInspection, tblCivilTownships and tblPad Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  2. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Well and WellHistry Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  3. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Perfs Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  4. ↑ "FracFocus Fracking Chemicals Database". 2019-04-02. Retrieved 2019-06-19. 
  5. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblStimulation Table". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  6. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  7. ↑ "Combined Production - Oil and Gas Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  8. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - Production Table - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  9. ↑ "Combined Production - Brine Data". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
  10. ↑ "Risk Based Data Management System - tblInspection, tblInspFail and tblinspFlDesc Tables". Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-16. 
Retrieved from "https://www.wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-013-20951&oldid=14270301"