X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-125-24880"

m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 37-125-24880
 
| Well ID: 37-125-24880
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="14" | {{#display_map: 40.040344, -80.352494 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.040344, -80.352494 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| County: [[Washington County, Pennsylvania|Washington]]
 
| County: [[Washington County, Pennsylvania|Washington]]
Line 9: Line 9:
 
| Municipality: [[Morris Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania|Morris Township]]
 
| Municipality: [[Morris Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania|Morris Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
| Operator Name: [[CNX GAS CO LLC|CNX GAS CO LLC]]
+
| Operator Name: [[CNX GAS CO LLC]]
 
|-
 
|-
| Well Pad ID: [[144585]]
+
| Well Pad ID: [[144585|144585]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Farm/Lease Name: CRUM NV55FHS
 
| Farm/Lease Name: CRUM NV55FHS
Line 17: Line 17:
 
| First Permit Date: 2012-11-07
 
| First Permit Date: 2012-11-07
 
|-
 
|-
| Last Permit Date: 2012-11-07
+
| Last Permit Date: 2013-06-10
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 2013-01-03
 
| Spud Date: 2013-01-03
Line 25: Line 25:
 
| Horizontal: Yes
 
| Horizontal: Yes
 
|-
 
|-
| Producing: Yes
+
| Well Status: ACTIVE
 
|-
 
|-
| Violations: None
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Latitude: 40.040344
 
| Latitude: 40.040344
Line 34: Line 34:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
== Production Data ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 +
!scope="col" | GAS QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-1
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-2
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-1
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 424358.12
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 44.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-2
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1060787.16
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 184.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2015-02
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 122869.93
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 28.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2015-01
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 91090.33
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 31.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2015-03
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 108908.6
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 31.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Production Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
 +
== Waste Data ==
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 +
!scope="col" | TYPE
 +
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | UNITS
 +
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 +
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 +
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 +
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 +
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-1
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 542.76
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| PAD059087072
 +
| MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC BULGER FACILITY
 +
| BULGER
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-1
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 65.81
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| PAD004835146
 +
| MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC YUKON FACILITY
 +
| YUKON
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-2
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 290.2
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| PAD059087072
 +
| MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC BULGER FACILITY
 +
| BULGER
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-2
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 434.86
 +
| Tons
 +
| RESIDUAL WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY
 +
| PAD004835146
 +
| MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC YUKON FACILITY
 +
| YUKON
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-1
 +
| FRACING FLUID WASTE
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.18
 +
| Bbl
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 100172
 +
| ARDEN LANDFILL
 +
| WASHINGTON
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-1
 +
| FRACING FLUID WASTE
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 18.0
 +
| Bbl
 +
| REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
 +
|
 +
| REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-1
 +
| PRODUCED FLUID
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 12.0
 +
| Bbl
 +
| REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
 +
|
 +
| REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-2
 +
| PRODUCED FLUID
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 11.0
 +
| Bbl
 +
| REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING
 +
|
 +
| REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Waste
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-26 }}</ref>
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 41: Line 226:
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2119825
 
| 2119825
 
| 2012-11-08
 
| 2012-11-08
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
| On November 8, 2012, Environmental Trainee, Carl Livermore and I stopped at CONSOL’s NV-55 site to conduct a pre-drill inspection of their perimeter E&S controls.
+
| On November 8, 2012, Environmental Trainee, Carl Livermore and I stopped at CONSOLï¾’s NV-55 site to conduct a pre-drill inspection of their perimeter E&S controls.
The E&S Plans were in the on-site mailbox and I pulled them and walked the site perimeter to check them against what was installed.  For the most part they matched, although I noted that the contractor added silt fence that wasn’t in the original plans.  This is not a problem but it needs to be added to the plans and be initialed by a WQS.
+
The E&S Plans were in the on-site mailbox and I pulled them and walked the site perimeter to check them against what was installed.  For the most part they matched, although I noted that the contractor added silt fence that wasnï¾’t in the original plans.  This is not a problem but it needs to be added to the plans and be initialed by a WQS.
 
CONSOL is using silt sox as their primary perimeter controls; we found some areas that were in danger of being overrun with sediment and some areas that the silt sox was damaged.  Additionally, in some areas the silt fence was not installed properly and in at least one area there was a animal tunnel under the fence.
 
CONSOL is using silt sox as their primary perimeter controls; we found some areas that were in danger of being overrun with sediment and some areas that the silt sox was damaged.  Additionally, in some areas the silt fence was not installed properly and in at least one area there was a animal tunnel under the fence.
CONSOL’s contractor had the site stabilized via hydroseeding.
+
CONSOLï¾’s contractor had the site stabilized via hydroseeding.
 
CONSOL has met pre- operation inspection obligation as outlined under 3258( a)( 1).
 
CONSOL has met pre- operation inspection obligation as outlined under 3258( a)( 1).
  
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 57: Line 246:
 
| 2012-11-21
 
| 2012-11-21
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
| On November 21, 2012, I conducted a follow-up inspection at CONSOL’s NV-55 site.  The site was completely inactive and there wasn’t even anybody in the guard shack.  I checked the E&S BMPs but it did not appear that any maintenance had been performed on them.   
+
| On November 21, 2012, I conducted a follow-up inspection at CONSOLï¾’s NV-55 site.  The site was completely inactive and there wasnï¾’t even anybody in the guard shack.  I checked the E&S BMPs but it did not appear that any maintenance had been performed on them.   
 
I will follow-up with CONSOL with this.
 
I will follow-up with CONSOL with this.
  
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 66: Line 257:
 
| 2013-02-12
 
| 2013-02-12
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2147532
 +
| 2013-03-11
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
| Checked the paperwork and E&S controls.  No violations found.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2194633
 +
| 2013-07-29
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2198461
 +
| 2013-07-25
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
| On July 25, 2013, I conducted an inspection at CONSOLï¾’s Nv-55 site.  At inspection, CONSOL was into the lateral on the 55F well and was at around 11,000 feet.
 +
Both the E&S plan and the PPC plan were in the mailbox at the site entrance.  The company needs to update the DEP contacts in the PPC plan.  I also found permits found permits for the A, B, C and F wells; I did not find a permit for the NV-55M well.
 +
CONSOL has an Act 9 sign out front. 
 +
Containment looked good and the vegetation looked very good although much of the vegetation was annual grasses.
 +
I found that there is drag-out from the access road onto the main road; additional BMPs are needed to address this problem.
 +
CONSOL is doing daily E&S inspections at the site.
 +
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
== Production Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
!scope="col" | GAS QUANTITY
+
| date = 2015-05-26
!scope="col" | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspections
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE QUANTITY
+
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS
+
== References ==
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
+
{{reflist}}
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
|}
 
== Waste Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 
!scope="col" | TYPE
 
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | UNITS
 
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
|}
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
 
 
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 12:30, 26 June 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 37-125-24880
Loading map...
County: Washington
Municipality: Morris Township
Operator Name: CNX GAS CO LLC
Well Pad ID: 144585
Farm/Lease Name: CRUM NV55FHS
First Permit Date: 2012-11-07
Last Permit Date: 2013-06-10
Spud Date: 2013-01-03
Unconventional: Yes
Horizontal: Yes
Well Status: ACTIVE
Violations: 0
Latitude: 40.040344
Longitude: -80.352494

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2013-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2013-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-1 424358.12 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-2 1060787.16 184.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-02 122869.93 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-01 91090.33 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-03 108908.6 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2013-1 DRILL CUTTINGS 542.76 Tons LANDFILL PAD059087072 MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC BULGER FACILITY BULGER PA
2013-1 DRILL CUTTINGS 65.81 Tons LANDFILL PAD004835146 MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC YUKON FACILITY YUKON PA
2013-2 DRILL CUTTINGS 290.2 Tons LANDFILL PAD059087072 MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC BULGER FACILITY BULGER PA
2013-2 DRILL CUTTINGS 434.86 Tons RESIDUAL WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY PAD004835146 MAX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC YUKON FACILITY YUKON PA
2014-1 FRACING FLUID WASTE 0.18 Bbl LANDFILL 100172 ARDEN LANDFILL WASHINGTON PA
2014-1 FRACING FLUID WASTE 18.0 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY
2014-1 PRODUCED FLUID 12.0 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY
2014-2 PRODUCED FLUID 11.0 Bbl REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING REUSE WITHOUT PROCESSING AT A PERMITTED FACILITY

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
2119825 2012-11-08 No Violations Noted On November 8, 2012, Environmental Trainee, Carl Livermore and I stopped at CONSOLï¾’s NV-55 site to conduct a pre-drill inspection of their perimeter E&S controls.

The E&S Plans were in the on-site mailbox and I pulled them and walked the site perimeter to check them against what was installed. For the most part they matched, although I noted that the contractor added silt fence that wasnï¾’t in the original plans. This is not a problem but it needs to be added to the plans and be initialed by a WQS. CONSOL is using silt sox as their primary perimeter controls; we found some areas that were in danger of being overrun with sediment and some areas that the silt sox was damaged. Additionally, in some areas the silt fence was not installed properly and in at least one area there was a animal tunnel under the fence. CONSOLï¾’s contractor had the site stabilized via hydroseeding. CONSOL has met pre- operation inspection obligation as outlined under 3258( a)( 1).

2120144 2012-11-21 No Violations Noted On November 21, 2012, I conducted a follow-up inspection at CONSOLï¾’s NV-55 site. The site was completely inactive and there wasnï¾’t even anybody in the guard shack. I checked the E&S BMPs but it did not appear that any maintenance had been performed on them.

I will follow-up with CONSOL with this.

2142642 2013-02-12 No Violations Noted
2147532 2013-03-11 No Violations Noted Checked the paperwork and E&S controls. No violations found.
2194633 2013-07-29 No Violations Noted
2198461 2013-07-25 No Violations Noted On July 25, 2013, I conducted an inspection at CONSOLï¾’s Nv-55 site. At inspection, CONSOL was into the lateral on the 55F well and was at around 11,000 feet.

Both the E&S plan and the PPC plan were in the mailbox at the site entrance. The company needs to update the DEP contacts in the PPC plan. I also found permits found permits for the A, B, C and F wells; I did not find a permit for the NV-55M well. CONSOL has an Act 9 sign out front. Containment looked good and the vegetation looked very good although much of the vegetation was annual grasses. I found that there is drag-out from the access road onto the main road; additional BMPs are needed to address this problem. CONSOL is doing daily E&S inspections at the site.

For data sources see[3]

References