If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | ||
| Well ID: 34-019-22298 | | Well ID: 34-019-22298 | ||
− | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40. | + | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.53062343, -81.07651556 | width=100% | height=100% }} |
|- | |- | ||
− | | County: | + | | County: [[Carroll County, Ohio|Carroll]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Municipality: | + | | Municipality: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Operator Name: | + | | Operator Name: [[CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION LLC]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Well Pad ID: | + | | Well Pad ID: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Farm/Lease Name: | + | | Farm/Lease Name: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | First Permit Date: | + | | First Permit Date: |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Last Permit Date: | + | | Last Permit Date: |
|- | |- | ||
| Spud Date: 2013-03-21 | | Spud Date: 2013-03-21 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Unconventional: | + | | Unconventional: No |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Configuration: Vertical |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Producing | + | | Well Status: Producing |
|- | |- | ||
| Violations: 0 | | Violations: 0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Latitude: 40. | + | | Latitude: 40.53062343 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Longitude: -81. | + | | Longitude: -81.07651556 |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY | !scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY | ||
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | !scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2014-1 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 101590.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 58.0 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 11569.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 58.0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2014-2 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 157524.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 91.0 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 13701.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 91.0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2014-3 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 166811.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 91.0 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 10565.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 91.0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2014-4 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 162714.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 90.0 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 9203.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 90.0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2015-1 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 114731.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 87.0 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 4532.0 | ||
+ | | style="text-align:right;" | 87.0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | |
− | + | | title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS | |
− | + | | publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/] | |
− | + | | date = 2015-06-19 | |
− | + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production | |
− | + | | accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Inspection Data == | == Inspection Data == | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | ||
Line 64: | Line 103: | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | !scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | !scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | ||
− | !scope="col" | | + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 126358745 | ||
+ | | 2014-04-16 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Follow up to Complaint #4643. Inspection in front of the house today revealed no observable noise or vibration from the well pad. I could here the compressors at the bottom of the lease road. The combustor was functioning and causing minimal vibration on the pad. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1323737126 | ||
+ | | 2014-08-07 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Follow up to Complaint #4643 with supervisor Tom Hill. Inspection in front of the house today revealed a slightly observable, low frequency noise from the well pad. Inspection of the well pad found the combustor creating a minor, vibrating energy through the louvers. Tom talked to the complainant and she said the situation was much improved since April. Tom is going to speak with Chesapeake about altering the set up and design of the combustor in order to mitigate the energy pulse emanating from through the louvers. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | -1354807949 | ||
+ | | 2014-04-08 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I was on location with Tom Hill to follow up on Complaint # 4643 concerning vibrations at a home 0.3 miles northwest of this pad and being caused by production operations. This well and 5 other horizontal wells are being placed into production on this pad including PN#s 22295, 22296, 22297, 22299, & 22300. We went by the complainant's home and observed a definite, low frequency sound/energy pulse emanating from the Putnam pad, much like what would be generated by a sub-woofer. Tom and I met with the Chesapeake production supervisor to inspect operations. Each well is producing through a dedicated sand separator and gas production unit. Liquids pass to a heated oil stabilizer to separate the heavier gases out of the produced oil. The heavier fractions are produced to 2 large LNG vessels and the oil is produced to a tank battery containing 8-400 barrel tanks. There are 2 compressors running on location. One is keeping the LNG vessels pressurized in order to keep the heavier fractions in the liquid state. The other is pressurizing the sales line to move the produced natural gas to market. We found the source of the vibrations emanating from the louvers on the vapor combustor that incinerates the residual, heavy gases not removed in the stabilizer. We were told that they were having trouble maintaining the heat in the stabilizer and that a more than expected heavier fraction was making it to the tanks and combustor. Chesapeake is working to correct the issue and reduce the low-frequency energy emanating from the combustor. I will check back next week on progress. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1369757990 | ||
+ | | 2013-05-24 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I was at the site checking the drilling progress. I met with Burl Miller, drilling consultant. The rig was in the process of drilling the surface hole at a depth of 352 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -2137894993 | | -2137894993 | ||
| 2013-05-25 | | 2013-05-25 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | | I went to the site to witness the cementing of the surface casing. The drilling contractor, Nomac 72, spudded the well on 05/24/2013. The 17.50 diameter surface hole was drilled to 610 | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2139491993 | ||
+ | | 2015-01-14 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I was on location to conduct a status check of this well. The well is open flow with a wellhead tree assembly. Jersey barriers were installed around the wellhead. The tank battery consisted of 8, 400 BBL production tanks and was diked. A windsock was installed on the top of the production tanks. Other production equipment on the well pad consisted of: | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -275365117 | | -275365117 | ||
| 2013-08-12 | | 2013-08-12 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| I was onsite to check for the possibility of runoff from the drilling pad running into a local residence pond. The property and the ponds were not clearly identified in the report and I checked some in the area. The ponds appear to have no issues and the pad is currently dry and does not show any signs of substantial runoff. A clearing has been made near the pad for what looks like a pipeline right away. An inspection will occur more thoroughly when more information is received. | | I was onsite to check for the possibility of runoff from the drilling pad running into a local residence pond. The property and the ponds were not clearly identified in the report and I checked some in the area. The ponds appear to have no issues and the pad is currently dry and does not show any signs of substantial runoff. A clearing has been made near the pad for what looks like a pipeline right away. An inspection will occur more thoroughly when more information is received. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 345968449 | ||
+ | | 2013-08-19 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I conducted a site inspection of this pad in response to complaint #4423. Complainant emailed Heather Maher of the Carroll County Health Department. They are seeing discolored water, dark stains on the banks, sheen like gas on the water and big slime silicon that is very heavy but floats. Complainant states the frogs are almost gone, the fish are acting weird, the deer are not coming around like they normally do and the Blue Herron is not around. The residence is located near the drilling pad at 2246 Alamo Rd. SE Carrollton, OH 44615. The wells on the drilling pad have not been hydraulically fractured yet and are static with no annular pressures seen on any of the wells. The storm water outflow normally installed on the location has been removed and runoff water from the pad is no longer being discharged off the location. I also inspected the residence and talked with the landowner regarding his issue. I walked the pond and saw the | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -420785604 | | -420785604 | ||
| 2013-03-22 | | 2013-03-22 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | I was on site to witness the cementing of the 20 | + | | I was on site to witness the cementing of the 20 conductor casing. My inspection revealed that Precision Rathole drilled a 26 hole to 16' and then finished drilling a 24 hole to a total depth of 110'. They ran 110' of 20 conductor casing (94 pound per foot / inside diameter of 19.124) with aprroximately 2' sticking up above ground level. O-TEX cemented the casing with 200 sacks of ClassA (2% CaCl, 1/2pound per sack cello-flake, and 0.4% C-41P. The cement had a density of 15.6 pounds per gallon, a yield of 1.18 cubic feet per sack, and they used 5.2 gallons of mix water per sack. They pumped 42 barrels of cement slurry and had 10 barrels of cement returns to surface. My inspection revealed no violations at this time. |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 432911207 | ||
+ | | 2013-06-04 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | I was onsite to witness 13554 feet of 5.5 production casing be cemented by Schlumberger. The job was cemented as planned and the cement was up to proper weight but there were several delays in the job. Twice during pumping the tail cement the Schlumberger cementing iron near the cement head leaked. This required a shutdown and a Nomac hand being raised to tighten down the connection. The delays did not affect the cement. In total 20 barrels of cement were returned to surface. Nomac 72 will be walking the rig to the 8H well as soon as the slips are set. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 71599928 | ||
+ | | 2014-04-14 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Follow up to Complaint #4643. Inspection in front of the house today revealed no observable noise or vibration from the well pad. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -889962382 | | -889962382 | ||
| 2013-07-12 | | 2013-07-12 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| I was onsite to check the erosion controls of this wellsite following strong storms that made it through the region the previous week. There were no issues on the pad and all erosion controls are working properly. The wells on this site are currently shut-in as they are waiting for the completions crew to come and hydraulically fracture the wells. All the six wells have well caps on them and the cellars are watertight as they have not been pumped out since the rains came through. There are no violations at this time. | | I was onsite to check the erosion controls of this wellsite following strong storms that made it through the region the previous week. There were no issues on the pad and all erosion controls are working properly. The wells on this site are currently shut-in as they are waiting for the completions crew to come and hydraulically fracture the wells. All the six wells have well caps on them and the cellars are watertight as they have not been pumped out since the rains came through. There are no violations at this time. | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -955899318 | | -955899318 | ||
| 2013-07-03 | | 2013-07-03 | ||
− | | | + | | |
| I was onsite to update the GPS coordinates for this wells as well as check the annulus pressure of these 6 wells drilled by Nomac 72. It is unsure when the wells be hydraulically fractured at this time. Currently there was a vacuum truck on location sucking water off the pad. There was also a Stonebridge crew onsite removing the rig containment that was leftover. All the wells were checked and none showed any signs of pressures on the wells. The wells are currently static and there are no violations at this time. | | I was onsite to update the GPS coordinates for this wells as well as check the annulus pressure of these 6 wells drilled by Nomac 72. It is unsure when the wells be hydraulically fractured at this time. Currently there was a vacuum truck on location sucking water off the pad. There was also a Stonebridge crew onsite removing the rig containment that was leftover. All the wells were checked and none showed any signs of pressures on the wells. The wells are currently static and there are no violations at this time. | ||
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | | | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
+ | | title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS | ||
+ | | publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/] | ||
+ | | date = 2015-06-19 | ||
+ | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection | ||
+ | | accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref> | ||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | {{reflist}} | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
[[Category:Wells]] | [[Category:Wells]] |
Well ID: 34-019-22298 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.53062343,"lon":-81.07651556,"icon":""}]} |
County: Carroll | |
Municipality: | |
Operator Name: CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION LLC | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: | |
First Permit Date: | |
Last Permit Date: | |
Spud Date: 2013-03-21 | |
Unconventional: No | |
Configuration: Vertical | |
Well Status: Producing | |
Violations: 0 | |
Latitude: 40.53062343 | |
Longitude: -81.07651556 |
PERIOD | GAS QUANTITY | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS | CONDENSATE QUANTITY | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS | OIL QUANTITY | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014-1 | 101590.0 | 58.0 | 11569.0 | 58.0 | ||
2014-2 | 157524.0 | 91.0 | 13701.0 | 91.0 | ||
2014-3 | 166811.0 | 91.0 | 10565.0 | 91.0 | ||
2014-4 | 162714.0 | 90.0 | 9203.0 | 90.0 | ||
2015-1 | 114731.0 | 87.0 | 4532.0 | 87.0 |
For data sources see[1]
INSPECTION ID | DATE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | VIOLATION ID | VIOLATION CODE | VIOLATION COMMENT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
126358745 | 2014-04-16 | Follow up to Complaint #4643. Inspection in front of the house today revealed no observable noise or vibration from the well pad. I could here the compressors at the bottom of the lease road. The combustor was functioning and causing minimal vibration on the pad. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||||
1323737126 | 2014-08-07 | Follow up to Complaint #4643 with supervisor Tom Hill. Inspection in front of the house today revealed a slightly observable, low frequency noise from the well pad. Inspection of the well pad found the combustor creating a minor, vibrating energy through the louvers. Tom talked to the complainant and she said the situation was much improved since April. Tom is going to speak with Chesapeake about altering the set up and design of the combustor in order to mitigate the energy pulse emanating from through the louvers. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||||
-1354807949 | 2014-04-08 | I was on location with Tom Hill to follow up on Complaint # 4643 concerning vibrations at a home 0.3 miles northwest of this pad and being caused by production operations. This well and 5 other horizontal wells are being placed into production on this pad including PN#s 22295, 22296, 22297, 22299, & 22300. We went by the complainant's home and observed a definite, low frequency sound/energy pulse emanating from the Putnam pad, much like what would be generated by a sub-woofer. Tom and I met with the Chesapeake production supervisor to inspect operations. Each well is producing through a dedicated sand separator and gas production unit. Liquids pass to a heated oil stabilizer to separate the heavier gases out of the produced oil. The heavier fractions are produced to 2 large LNG vessels and the oil is produced to a tank battery containing 8-400 barrel tanks. There are 2 compressors running on location. One is keeping the LNG vessels pressurized in order to keep the heavier fractions in the liquid state. The other is pressurizing the sales line to move the produced natural gas to market. We found the source of the vibrations emanating from the louvers on the vapor combustor that incinerates the residual, heavy gases not removed in the stabilizer. We were told that they were having trouble maintaining the heat in the stabilizer and that a more than expected heavier fraction was making it to the tanks and combustor. Chesapeake is working to correct the issue and reduce the low-frequency energy emanating from the combustor. I will check back next week on progress. | ||||
1369757990 | 2013-05-24 | I was at the site checking the drilling progress. I met with Burl Miller, drilling consultant. The rig was in the process of drilling the surface hole at a depth of 352 | ||||
-2137894993 | 2013-05-25 | I went to the site to witness the cementing of the surface casing. The drilling contractor, Nomac 72, spudded the well on 05/24/2013. The 17.50 diameter surface hole was drilled to 610 | ||||
2139491993 | 2015-01-14 | I was on location to conduct a status check of this well. The well is open flow with a wellhead tree assembly. Jersey barriers were installed around the wellhead. The tank battery consisted of 8, 400 BBL production tanks and was diked. A windsock was installed on the top of the production tanks. Other production equipment on the well pad consisted of: | ||||
-275365117 | 2013-08-12 | I was onsite to check for the possibility of runoff from the drilling pad running into a local residence pond. The property and the ponds were not clearly identified in the report and I checked some in the area. The ponds appear to have no issues and the pad is currently dry and does not show any signs of substantial runoff. A clearing has been made near the pad for what looks like a pipeline right away. An inspection will occur more thoroughly when more information is received. | ||||
345968449 | 2013-08-19 | I conducted a site inspection of this pad in response to complaint #4423. Complainant emailed Heather Maher of the Carroll County Health Department. They are seeing discolored water, dark stains on the banks, sheen like gas on the water and big slime silicon that is very heavy but floats. Complainant states the frogs are almost gone, the fish are acting weird, the deer are not coming around like they normally do and the Blue Herron is not around. The residence is located near the drilling pad at 2246 Alamo Rd. SE Carrollton, OH 44615. The wells on the drilling pad have not been hydraulically fractured yet and are static with no annular pressures seen on any of the wells. The storm water outflow normally installed on the location has been removed and runoff water from the pad is no longer being discharged off the location. I also inspected the residence and talked with the landowner regarding his issue. I walked the pond and saw the | ||||
-420785604 | 2013-03-22 | I was on site to witness the cementing of the 20 conductor casing. My inspection revealed that Precision Rathole drilled a 26 hole to 16' and then finished drilling a 24 hole to a total depth of 110'. They ran 110' of 20 conductor casing (94 pound per foot / inside diameter of 19.124) with aprroximately 2' sticking up above ground level. O-TEX cemented the casing with 200 sacks of ClassA (2% CaCl, 1/2pound per sack cello-flake, and 0.4% C-41P. The cement had a density of 15.6 pounds per gallon, a yield of 1.18 cubic feet per sack, and they used 5.2 gallons of mix water per sack. They pumped 42 barrels of cement slurry and had 10 barrels of cement returns to surface. My inspection revealed no violations at this time. | ||||
432911207 | 2013-06-04 | I was onsite to witness 13554 feet of 5.5 production casing be cemented by Schlumberger. The job was cemented as planned and the cement was up to proper weight but there were several delays in the job. Twice during pumping the tail cement the Schlumberger cementing iron near the cement head leaked. This required a shutdown and a Nomac hand being raised to tighten down the connection. The delays did not affect the cement. In total 20 barrels of cement were returned to surface. Nomac 72 will be walking the rig to the 8H well as soon as the slips are set. | ||||
71599928 | 2014-04-14 | Follow up to Complaint #4643. Inspection in front of the house today revealed no observable noise or vibration from the well pad. I will continue to monitor the situation. | ||||
-889962382 | 2013-07-12 | I was onsite to check the erosion controls of this wellsite following strong storms that made it through the region the previous week. There were no issues on the pad and all erosion controls are working properly. The wells on this site are currently shut-in as they are waiting for the completions crew to come and hydraulically fracture the wells. All the six wells have well caps on them and the cellars are watertight as they have not been pumped out since the rains came through. There are no violations at this time. | ||||
-955899318 | 2013-07-03 | I was onsite to update the GPS coordinates for this wells as well as check the annulus pressure of these 6 wells drilled by Nomac 72. It is unsure when the wells be hydraulically fractured at this time. Currently there was a vacuum truck on location sucking water off the pad. There was also a Stonebridge crew onsite removing the rig containment that was leftover. All the wells were checked and none showed any signs of pressures on the wells. The wells are currently static and there are no violations at this time. |
For data sources see[2]