X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-125-24627"

(Created page with "== Well Details == {{125-24627-Details}} __TOC__ == Well Inspection Data == {{125-24627-inspection}} == Production Data == {{125-24627-production}} == Waste Data == {{125-2462...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Well Details ==
 
== Well Details ==
−
{{125-24627-Details}}
+
{| class="wikitable" width="95%"
 +
| Well ID: 125-24627
 +
| style="width: 50%; height=100%; align=center" rowspan="14" | {{#display_map: 40.096563, -80.290411 | width=100% | height=100% }}
 +
|-
 +
| County: [[Washington County, Pennsylvania|Washington]]
 +
|-
 +
| Municipality: [[South Franklin Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania|South Franklin Township]]
 +
|-
 +
| Operator Name: [[CNX GAS CO LLC]]
 +
|-
 +
| Farm/Lease Name: CONSOL NV42CHS
 +
|-
 +
| First Permit Date: 2011-12-09
 +
|-
 +
| Last Permit Date: 2011-12-09
 +
|-
 +
| Spud Date: 2012-04-05
 +
|-
 +
| Unconventional: Yes
 +
|-
 +
| Horizontal: Yes
 +
|-
 +
| Producing: Yes
 +
|-
 +
| Violations: 3
 +
|-
 +
| Latitude: 40.096563
 +
|-
 +
| Longitude: -80.290411
 +
|-
 +
|}
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
 
== Well Inspection Data ==
 
== Well Inspection Data ==
−
{{125-24627-inspection}}
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | INSPECTION ID
 +
!scope="col" | DATE
 +
!scope="col" | DESCRIPTION
 +
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 +
|-
 +
| 2066602
 +
| 2012-03-12
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
| Landowners were worried eabout landslides from drilling/blasting.  Well is 0.35 miles horizontally and the leg is one mile beneath them.  I found no problems.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2066618
 +
| 2012-03-12
 +
| Violation(s) Noted
 +
| On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.
 +
 
 +
The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance.  Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.
 +
 
 +
We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.
 +
 
 +
There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good.  The finished slopes were not stabilized.
 +
 
 +
We did find where sediment had left the pad.
 +
 
 +
These are all violations.
 +
 
 +
| 638988
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2066618
 +
| 2012-03-12
 +
| Violation(s) Noted
 +
| On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.
 +
 
 +
The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance.  Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.
 +
 
 +
We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.
 +
 
 +
There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good.  The finished slopes were not stabilized.
 +
 
 +
We did find where sediment had left the pad.
 +
 
 +
These are all violations.
 +
 
 +
| 638990
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2066618
 +
| 2012-03-12
 +
| Violation(s) Noted
 +
| On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.
 +
 
 +
The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance.  Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.
 +
 
 +
We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.
 +
 
 +
There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good.  The finished slopes were not stabilized.
 +
 
 +
We did find where sediment had left the pad.
 +
 
 +
These are all violations.
 +
 
 +
| 638991
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2066618
 +
| 2012-03-12
 +
| Violation(s) Noted
 +
| On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.
 +
 
 +
The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance.  Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.
 +
 
 +
We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.
 +
 
 +
There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good.  The finished slopes were not stabilized.
 +
 
 +
We did find where sediment had left the pad.
 +
 
 +
These are all violations.
 +
 
 +
| 638991
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2074467
 +
| 2012-06-01
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2096314
 +
| 2012-08-28
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
| On August 28, 2012, I stopped at CNX’s NV-42 site for a Compliance Evaluation Inspection; I met with Spenser Johnson.
 +
 
 +
CNX has drilled all the wells on NV-42 vertically and is waiting horizontal drilling.
 +
 
 +
The slopes and sides are vegetated.  Although some areas are a bit spares, I consider the slopes stable.
 +
 
 +
The E&S plans are on-site and it looked like they installed them according to those plans.  CNX placed added a rock pad to the access road’s bank and we added that to the plans.  Some of the storm water ditches were showing signs of erosion and I suggested adding some extra rock to them.
 +
 
 +
I found no problems during this inspection.
 +
 
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2112739
 +
| 2012-10-23
 +
| No Violations Noted
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|}
 
== Production Data ==
 
== Production Data ==
−
{{125-24627-production}}
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 +
!scope="col" | GAS QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-2
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-1
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-2
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|}
 
== Waste Data ==
 
== Waste Data ==
−
{{125-24627-waste}}
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | PERIOD
 +
!scope="col" | TYPE
 +
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
 +
!scope="col" | UNITS
 +
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 +
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 +
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 +
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 +
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-2
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 64.51
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 100592
 +
| SOUTH HILLS LANDFILL
 +
| SOUTH HILLS
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-2
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 304.63
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 100172
 +
| WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC  - ARDEN LANDFILL, INC.
 +
| WASHINGTON
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-1
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1.4
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 0250050885
 +
| SOIL REMEDIATION INC. (SRI)
 +
| LOWELLVILLE
 +
| OH
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-1
 +
| DRILLING FLUID WASTE
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 767.38
 +
| Bbl
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 0250050885
 +
| SOIL REMEDIATION INC. (SRI)
 +
| LOWELLVILLE
 +
| OH
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-1
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 254.03
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 100592
 +
| SOUTH HILLS LANDFILL
 +
| SOUTH HILLS
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-1
 +
| DRILL CUTTINGS
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 528.36
 +
| Tons
 +
| LANDFILL
 +
| 100172
 +
| WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC  - ARDEN LANDFILL, INC.
 +
| WASHINGTON
 +
| PA
 +
|-
 +
|}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 19:03, 30 April 2014

Well Details

Well ID: 125-24627
Loading map...
County: Washington
Municipality: South Franklin Township
Operator Name: CNX GAS CO LLC
Farm/Lease Name: CONSOL NV42CHS
First Permit Date: 2011-12-09
Last Permit Date: 2011-12-09
Spud Date: 2012-04-05
Unconventional: Yes
Horizontal: Yes
Producing: Yes
Violations: 3
Latitude: 40.096563
Longitude: -80.290411

Well Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID
2066602 2012-03-12 No Violations Noted Landowners were worried eabout landslides from drilling/blasting. Well is 0.35 miles horizontally and the leg is one mile beneath them. I found no problems.
2066618 2012-03-12 Violation(s) Noted On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.

The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance. Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.

We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.

There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good. The finished slopes were not stabilized.

We did find where sediment had left the pad.

These are all violations.

638988
2066618 2012-03-12 Violation(s) Noted On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.

The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance. Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.

We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.

There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good. The finished slopes were not stabilized.

We did find where sediment had left the pad.

These are all violations.

638990
2066618 2012-03-12 Violation(s) Noted On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.

The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance. Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.

We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.

There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good. The finished slopes were not stabilized.

We did find where sediment had left the pad.

These are all violations.

638991
2066618 2012-03-12 Violation(s) Noted On March 12, 2012, WQS John Ley and I stopped at CNX’s NV-32 pad to check the E&S controls.

The first thing we found was an oil sheen on the access road at the pad’s entrance; probably from a backhoe at the entrance. Although a contractor and a security guard were on-site, no effort was being made to clean up the spill.

We could not find a copy of the Erosion and Sedimentation plan.

There were some E&S controls (silt sox) on-site but they did not always seem to be placed where they could do the most good. The finished slopes were not stabilized.

We did find where sediment had left the pad.

These are all violations.

638991
2074467 2012-06-01 No Violations Noted
2096314 2012-08-28 No Violations Noted On August 28, 2012, I stopped at CNX’s NV-42 site for a Compliance Evaluation Inspection; I met with Spenser Johnson.

CNX has drilled all the wells on NV-42 vertically and is waiting horizontal drilling.

The slopes and sides are vegetated. Although some areas are a bit spares, I consider the slopes stable.

The E&S plans are on-site and it looked like they installed them according to those plans. CNX placed added a rock pad to the access road’s bank and we added that to the plans. Some of the storm water ditches were showing signs of erosion and I suggested adding some extra rock to them.

I found no problems during this inspection.

2112739 2012-10-23 No Violations Noted

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2012-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2012-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2011-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2012-2 DRILL CUTTINGS 64.51 Tons LANDFILL 100592 SOUTH HILLS LANDFILL SOUTH HILLS PA
2012-2 DRILL CUTTINGS 304.63 Tons LANDFILL 100172 WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC - ARDEN LANDFILL, INC. WASHINGTON PA
2012-1 DRILL CUTTINGS 1.4 Tons LANDFILL 0250050885 SOIL REMEDIATION INC. (SRI) LOWELLVILLE OH
2012-1 DRILLING FLUID WASTE 767.38 Bbl LANDFILL 0250050885 SOIL REMEDIATION INC. (SRI) LOWELLVILLE OH
2012-1 DRILL CUTTINGS 254.03 Tons LANDFILL 100592 SOUTH HILLS LANDFILL SOUTH HILLS PA
2012-1 DRILL CUTTINGS 528.36 Tons LANDFILL 100172 WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC - ARDEN LANDFILL, INC. WASHINGTON PA
Retrieved from "https://www.wellwiki.org/index.php?title=37-125-24627&oldid=277774"